Recently, everyone has been talking about AI Agents automatically running on-chain interactions.


As I munch on potato chips, I think: If it becomes fully automated, does that mean my hands are completely turned into "pastries"...
But honestly, someone still needs to be the safety net.
For example, during authorization, the Agent might only look at "can it complete the transaction," but people need to consider "how much permission was granted, and whether it might accidentally open the wallet door too wide."
And for signature confirmation, jumping between protocols, if something goes wrong, it’s not just losing a meal’s worth of money.
Plus, the current on-chain data tools and tagging systems are criticized for being laggy or easily misled, so if the Agent makes decisions based on tags, it’s also quite easy to be led astray.
Anyway, my current approach is: let it help me run the process, but I still keep an eye on final confirmation, limits, and risk control thresholds.
That’s how I’m doing it for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin