Someone asked me whether those "coincidental transfers" on the chain are really scripts, to be honest I usually don't jump to conclusions first, I break down the path: where does the money come from (exchange withdrawal, bridge transfer, or contract return), is there a common "cleaning" node in the middle (multi-hop small amounts, splitting and regrouping), and finally whether it ends up in a vault, a CEX, or goes back to opening a position. Many things that look like coincidences are actually the same set of habitual actions repeated; the addresses are just changing passports.



These days, the group is again discussing stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and rumors of "de-pegging." When emotions run high, it's easy to treat any large transfer as a signal. My approach is: first connect 3-5 hops before and after the same batch of funds; if it can be explained, treat it as a process. If not, then suspect "someone is acting." Be patient, the chain doesn't lie, we just love to fill in the gaps with our imagination.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments