(The FSA) previously regulated cryptocurrency assets under the “Funds Settlement Act,” using payment methods as the basis for supervision. With the continued expansion of cryptocurrency assets’ investment uses, the proportion of users holding such assets for profit has risen significantly, and the current regulatory framework is no longer able to effectively protect investors’ rights and interests. Against this backdrop, the Financial Services Agency decided to shift the regulatory framework to the “Financial Instruments and Exchange Act,” so that, in terms of legal classification, cryptocurrency assets are placed alongside traditional financial products such as stocks and bonds, and relevant industry players will also face compliance standards similar to those of traditional financial institutions. This transition further aligns Japan’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework with the mainstream financial regulations of major G7 economies.



Core provisions of the amendment: stronger obligations and upgraded criminal penalties

Key changes in this amendment include:

- **Insider trading ban:** An explicit prohibition on trading cryptocurrency assets using material non-public information, filling a gap in current law.
- **Annual information disclosure obligation:** Cryptocurrency asset issuers must regularly disclose financial and business information to the competent authorities and investors.
- **Change of industry operator name:** Registered operators will be officially renamed from “cryptocurrency exchange operators” to “cryptocurrency trading operators.”
- **Harsher criminal penalties:** For unlicensed operators, the maximum prison term increases from 3 years to 10 years, and the fine cap increases from 3,000,000 yen to 10,000,000 yen.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 12
  • 11
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
RugpullTaster
· 04-17 04:30
Transferring cryptocurrencies into the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act framework in Japan is quite crucial this time. Insider trading and periodic disclosures finally address the previous shortcomings; however, compliance costs will skyrocket. It’s likely that small exchanges and project teams will be pushed out first, benefiting leading players and institutional investors entering the market.
View OriginalReply0
MevStreetPhotographer
· 04-16 20:38
Japan is treating crypto assets entirely as financial products, with insider trading and disclosure compliance being quite crucial; a 10-year prison sentence is also quite harsh, and as compliance costs increase later on, smaller projects will probably find it even harder to survive.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-53a6e1a8
· 04-16 08:14
Japan is treating the crypto industry truly as a "financial product" to regulate. Filling in the gaps with insider trading and disclosure obligations is a good thing, but compliance costs will increase. Small platforms are likely to be cleared out; let's see if innovation will also be suppressed along with it.
View OriginalReply0
Miner'sHelmetUnderTheMoonlight
· 04-16 04:25
Japan is treating the cryptocurrency industry as "legitimate finance," which benefits compliant exchanges and long-term capital inflows, but with increased scrutiny on project disclosures and insider trading, small coins and gray-market activities are basically doomed.
View OriginalReply0
MosaicBowtieRealm
· 04-15 17:42
This step in Japan is quite crucial. Moving the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act toward the “securities regulation” framework is more like securities oversight: with insider trading and disclosure requirements being filled in, this is a positive for compliance and institutional entry, but the compliance costs for smaller projects and exchanges will also rise significantly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-991fc58a
· 04-15 08:41
Japan's move to include cryptocurrencies in the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act is considered "maturing": insider trading and periodic disclosures are now in place, with stronger protections for retail investors, but compliance costs have skyrocketed, and small and medium exchanges and project teams are likely to be reshuffled.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c25a653c
· 04-15 01:25
Japan's move to bring the crypto industry under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act is considered a "reaffirmation + increased enforcement," with insider trading and disclosure compliance being quite critical; however, compliance costs will skyrocket, exchanges and project teams may accelerate asset liquidation, making it even harder for small players.
View OriginalReply0
WeekendGatekeeper
· 04-14 21:59
Japan’s latest push to bring the crypto space under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act is pretty hardcore: insider trading and periodic disclosures have been added to plug major loopholes. Compliance costs are likely to soar, but it will be more favorable for institutions to enter. The key is how this gets implemented in practice—don’t take a one-size-fits-all approach that cuts innovation off at the knees.
View OriginalReply0
BerryColdWallet
· 04-14 07:19
Japan is treating the cryptocurrency industry as "legitimate finance," and after the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act was enacted, the thresholds for insider trading, disclosure, and licensing have become stricter. In the long run, this benefits compliant projects, but small and medium-sized exchanges and copycat issuers face significant pressure.
View OriginalReply0
L2NightCourier
· 04-14 07:19
Japan's move is basically treating cryptocurrencies as "financial products," with insider trading and regular disclosures being positive for compliance, but the high thresholds and costs will also discourage small teams. The outright ban on unlicensed operations for 10 years is too harsh.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned