Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
SK Hynix
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Accused of Being Satoshi Nakamoto, Cryptographer Adam Back Denies Allegations
Renowned cryptographer and CEO of Blockstream, Adam Back, firmly denies the investigation report by The New York Times (NYT) that accuses him of being behind Satoshi Nakamoto. In the report released on Wednesday (08/04), NYT claims there is strong evidence from stylistic similarities (stylometry) and technical track records between Back’s Hashcash discovery and the basic architecture of Bitcoin.
Through his personal X account on Thursday (09/04), Adam Back explained that the similarities are merely coincidental due to his active participation in digital privacy and e-cash research since 1992. He emphasized that he is not Satoshi and does not know the true identity of Bitcoin’s creator. According to Back, the NYT’s claim is just a confirmation bias resulting from the numerous comments he made on the Cypherpunk forum in the past.
Responding to this controversy, Michael Saylor also offered a defense, stating that past email correspondence evidence shows Back and Satoshi are two different entities. Saylor emphasized that as long as there is no valid proof involving Satoshi’s private keys, all these identity theories are just narratives without legitimate evidence. For the crypto community, Satoshi’s anonymity remains a core pillar that preserves Bitcoin’s neutrality as a global asset.#GateSquareAprilPostingChallenge