The project team's ticker naming really needs to be taken seriously. Green was originally a good target, but it was completely ruined by those messy and chaotic naming strategies—when the name seems to be able to trend to the fourth spot on hot searches, and once the hot search drops, the story is over, and the project disappears without a trace. This logic is indeed quite ironic.



Instead of messing around with these flashy things, it's better to make the name clear so that people scanning the chain can recognize it at a glance. This is actually more beneficial. Projects like Safu and Abebe have the same problem—they are good targets in themselves, but their naming design has been deliberately made ugly. Developers can have such ideas, which is understandable, but if the ticker were more intuitive and standardized, it might be more attractive. Sometimes, simplicity itself is the best marketing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned