Over the past few years of doing DeFi, my biggest takeaway is one sentence: blindly sticking to a single scenario is just a waste of potential.



Initially, I was no different from most retail investors, focusing my USD1 funds on just one type of financial product. Even with staking rights, just splitting and staking separately, funds couldn’t circulate efficiently. The annual yield was stuck at a ceiling of 40%, and pushing beyond that was difficult.

Later, unable to tolerate this situation anymore, I decided to try connecting three types of rights: slisBNB, clisBNB, and LISTA. Honestly, I didn’t expect such a clear effect—it opened another door. With a $500,000 fund pool, the annualized return shot up to 69%, and the maximum drawdown was only 3.2%, much more stable than just holding a conservative position.

The logic behind this isn’t mysterious at all. I clarified the roles of these three rights: slisBNB handles liquidity reserves, ensuring funds can move at any time and earning some basic yield as a foundation; clisBNB is used for short-term appreciation, activating idle funds through cyclic new issues to make quick profits and supplement overall returns; LISTA is for long-term holding, digging for excess returns and earning dividends as a safety net.

This way, the three rights no longer operate independently. Funds can circulate flexibly across different scenarios, allowing one amount of money to earn both short-term and long-term gains. Liquidity and security are both taken into account. During market volatility, I can quickly adjust positions to reduce drawdown without missing new opportunities.

Sharing four practical insights, all learned from pitfalls:

First, the value of a fund pool isn’t in a single scenario but in the synergistic effect between scenarios.

Second, rights should match scenario needs; more isn’t always better for higher yields.

Third, retail investors shouldn’t blindly predict market trends; focusing on systematic operations is more reliable.

Fourth, the rhythm of capital deployment is more important than scale; with the right timing, small funds can generate big returns.

Now I’ve completely shifted from fragmented strategies to a systematic, interconnected approach. Returns are more stable, and my mindset has become more relaxed. This is the long-term path for DeFi wealth management.
USD1-0.04%
LISTA5.51%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektButStillHerevip
· 01-10 14:17
Wow, is the 69% annualized return real... I have to try it I was wondering why I’ve been stuck around 40+, turns out I was still fighting on different fronts during meals, no wonder This coordinated logic sounds reliable, but it requires a lot of caution in practice I have deep experience with the rhythm of funds; I previously lost a bit by blindly rushing to exit Wait, can slisBNB and clisBNB really connect seamlessly like this? But honestly, systematic operation is definitely better than just staring at K-line charts every day I’ll try converting my idle coins into this setup and play around this week
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodgervip
· 01-08 17:02
69% annualized? Man, I have to admit I’m a bit skeptical about this number, but the idea is indeed clear—holding a single currency is a trap. --- Participating in new listings through coordinated efforts is definitely more enjoyable than direct trading, but I’m worried that if one link fails, the whole thing could blow up. The risk is hard to gauge. --- Among the four insights, the third one is the most useful; the others sound like after-the-fact armchair strategies. --- Wait, is the clisBNB cycle listing really stable? I haven’t seen consecutive crashes before. --- I agree with the point about capital rhythm; it’s much more important than volume. I just worry that if the rhythm is off, a retracement could lead to a complete blow-up. --- Jumping from 500K to 690K makes a huge difference, but can small retail investors coordinate 50U like this? It seems that only large funds can really enjoy these benefits.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMelonWatchervip
· 01-08 09:53
Is the 69% annualized return real, or is it backtested data?
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 01-08 09:45
Is the 69% annualized return just hype? The drawdown is really only 3.2%? You really dare to say that. I want to see if I can reproduce it. It just feels like spreading eggs into different baskets to share the risk. This strategy looks complicated, but it's actually just a matter of fund allocation. I should have realized long ago that fighting alone won't make money, but unfortunately, I'm still stubbornly sticking to staking.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degenvip
· 01-08 09:45
69% annualized? Come on, I feel like I've heard a similar story a hundred times. Sounds good, but it feels overly complicated. How many retail investors can truly hold onto this logic? The term "synergy," how does it feel like a trick? Big returns never come from small funds; it's a low-probability event, okay? If this combo is so effective, why are big funds still fighting alone? Finally, staying calm? I believe it. Maybe it's just because you're temporarily making money. When the coin price halves, we'll see.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarkervip
· 01-08 09:44
well technically the real play isn't stacking yields, it's orchestrating them... dude went from running solo strategies to actual systems thinking and the math checks out ngl
Reply0
WagmiWarriorvip
· 01-08 09:32
Wow, this 69% annualized return, how did they do it? I need to dig into it. The synthetic asset linkage really seems powerful, unlike the previous random trading feeling. Hey, this logic is actually just a multiplier of funds, got it. Reaching 690,000 with a 69% return is the real way to go. I previously followed the trend and played single stake, but it was really a waste. Now I understand what it means to have a rhythm in funds... small capital is ecstatic. I need to mark this case study. The LISTA dividend bottom-line trick is brilliant. Wait, how is the 3.2% drawdown controlled? This risk management definitely has some expertise. Liquidity reserves + short-term appreciation + long-term holding, I like these three layers. I used to stack rights and interests thinking I could earn passively, but it turns out the key is the synergy effect.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 01-08 09:29
69% annualized looks great, but I want to know how long this portfolio can last in a bear market. Single-coin mining indeed has a low ceiling, but does the risk factor increase with the three-coin linkage? I want to try, but I feel like I need to watch closely. Can retail investors really lock in the rhythm? The logic of compound interest is sound, but I'm worried about pitfalls when rebalancing. A 3.2% drawdown sounds outrageous. Is there some risk we're missing?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)