2026-01-08 08:27:43

Right now, many blockchain AI projects are playing out the same routine—demo effects, parameter benchmarking, performance numbers taking turns. It seems grand, but in reality, they are all following the same path.

But there are also projects taking a completely different approach.

They are not exhausting themselves to hype up the buzz, but doing something that may not seem glamorous, yet is extremely solid:

👉 considers the world fundamentally adversarial rather than naturally friendly.

This is reflected in all aspects. From open-source model architecture to the design logic of inference agents, and even in the keywords repeatedly appearing in research reports—malicious nodes, attack paths, verification crashes—these projects' underlying assumptions always point in the same direction:

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-11 05:59

Really, now demos are everywhere, with sets of numbers all over the place, all the same. No wonder there are so many jokes in the crypto world. --- From the perspective of adversarial thinking, it's quite fresh and much more reliable than those who boast about themselves all day long. --- Is it interesting to compete over demo parameters? It's better to think about how to prevent malicious nodes in reality. --- Ah, finally someone hits this pain point. Most are just self-indulgent; this is true building. --- Wait a minute, isn't this kind of thinking more prone to failure... At least defense should involve offense, right? --- Reliable projects are indeed low-key, and those who hype up the heat every day should have cooled down long ago. --- Malicious nodes, attack paths... sounds like maximum security awareness, but how does it actually work in practice? --- This is how blockchain should look. Adversarial design must be thought through from the very beginning.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-10 18:11

Really, a bunch of demo show-offs are causing chaos in the market, and some people actually believe those numbers. Projects that genuinely focus on security and defense are truly rare; most are still chasing the trend. This is the right approach—design systems that include bad actors.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-10 13:44

This is how you do things properly. Projects that don't follow the trend and boast are indeed rare.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketNoodler

· 01-08 08:57

Really, now there are demos everywhere showing off, each one more impressive than the last, but then nothing more comes of it. Projects with this defensive mindset actually seem more clear-headed... --- Most are still playing parameter games, only these few are seriously thinking about attack paths. Why is the difference so big? --- No show-off, no pretenses, just straightforward confrontation of hypotheses. I agree with this approach. It's much more reliable than a bunch of flashy stuff. --- Honestly, who hasn't seen dozens of projects claiming to have performance that surpasses others... Only those with fundamentally different logic are worth paying attention to. --- From demo to malicious nodes, there's a whole lot of sincerity in between. --- Yeah, why insist on all-in optimistic assumptions? Defensive design is the long-term thinking.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 01-08 08:57

This is the real deal, not just a demo show.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 01-08 08:57

No hype, no trash talk. This is the project that is truly making moves. Those who show off parameters every day are just paper tigers; the ones that can really survive have definitely considered all kinds of shit possibilities.

View OriginalReply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-08 08:56

Oh no, another batch of demo contestants spinning on stage. I'm already tired of it. The truly interesting ones are those quietly building defenses in the corner—treating blockchain as a battlefield rather than an amusement park—that's the real solid work.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-08 08:55

Still working on project code at 2 a.m., I found that truly reliable teams are indeed working on defense mechanisms, not just stacking parameters. Liquidity depth can actually indicate the issue.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 01-08 08:54

Doing this is quite interesting—it's a true safety mindset rather than just that PPT-style security. Most projects are still comparing parameters, while these guys are already thinking about how to prevent bankruptcy.

View OriginalReply0

FastLeaver

· 01-08 08:50

Really, a bunch of projects just talk about parameters and performance numbers. I'm already tired of it... On the other hand, those that prioritize security as the main focus are actually more reliable. Solidness is the key to winning.

View OriginalReply0