2026-01-02 09:25:54

At a glance, some projects in this chart are indeed disappointing. Reflecting on the promises made by the Grok project at launch and comparing them to its actual performance later, the gap is quite significant. The crypto community has always been strict in judging project quality, which is also a sign of market self-purification. Ultimately, only those with real strength and a clear technical roadmap tend to survive. The market always votes with its feet.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShamedApeSeller

· 3h ago

grok is just a joke now. Do you all forget how loudly that promise was made back then?

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 3h ago

Well, Grok's performance was really disappointing. They hyped it up so much, and this is the result?

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 3h ago

Grok's thing is basically just that the big picture is painted too full. It's time to wake up now.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBouncer

· 3h ago

grok this wave indeed underperformed, where is the promised commitment? --- Market cleansing is ruthless; trash projects must die. --- Hard power is the key; just talking is long overdue to cool down. --- Foot voting never lies; I believe in those who truly have substance. --- That's why I only pay attention to teams that get things done; everything else is just white noise. --- Is the gap between promises and reality always like this? --- Those who survive are the ones with real value; this rule never fails.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 3h ago

Grok, this thing really underperformed; they hyped it up so much, but in the end... it still comes down to real skills.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleSurfer