2026-01-02 00:26:32

Vibes won't cut it when selecting your models. Here's what actually works: establish concrete benchmarks tailored to your specific use case first. Then run rigorous tests across multiple dimensions—reasoning capability, document grounding accuracy, tool integration reliability, and output variance under different conditions. The data tells the real story. Don't fall for brand names or hype cycles. Evaluate models based on their actual behavior and performance metrics. The model that delivers results for your workflow is the one worth deploying, regardless of its reputation in the community.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropATM

· 2h ago

It's the same old story, but there are still people following the trend and buying large language models. They just place orders based on marketing hype—what a painful lesson.

View OriginalReply0

SilentAlpha

· 2h ago

NGL, this is exactly what I've been wanting to say. Listening to influencers talk is useless; you need to analyze the data yourself.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 2h ago

Well said, but I'm afraid most people are still following the trend and buying popular models.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 2h ago

nah this is just basic protocol economics applied to model selection... the real play is finding the governance attack vector in whichever framework everyone's hyping rn

Reply0