Most people vastly underestimate counterparty risk in crypto. There's a critical distinction that often gets glossed over: bearer assets versus non-bearer assets. A bearer asset means you hold it directly—no intermediary, no trust required. A non-bearer asset, by contrast, depends entirely on a third party. That's where the risk lives. You're not just betting on the asset itself; you're betting on the counterparty never failing, never disappearing, never being compromised. Big difference. Understanding this gap isn't academic—it shapes your entire custody and allocation strategy.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CafeMinorvip
· 3h ago
Really, how many people are sleeping through their trades on the exchange, never considering the possibility of the other party going bankrupt.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxivip
· 3h ago
Really, most people are completely unaware of this trap. Self-custody is the way to go; everything else is just gambling.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 4h ago
Rough language, but the reasoning is sound: self-custody is truly the only way out
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)