2026-01-01 08:22:01

Most retail traders are just creating noise

Reacting to candlestick charts, hesitating, and then watching the market slip away

What is the true logic of making money? Using institutional-level trading signals

What do reliable quantitative tools look like? Buy and sell signals with over 70% accuracy, zero repaint, backed by a decade of market data accumulation. This is the institutional advantage that retail traders can access

It's not about luck, but a complete system with structure, discipline, and verification mechanisms. From real-time data to execution signals, everything that should be there is included

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletsWatcher

· 5h ago

Here comes another scheme to fool retail investors into buying tools, 70% accuracy? Wake up, friends. The set of strategies used by institutions is not something we can learn. Don't get harvested and still keep paying. Ten years of data accumulation? They won't sell it to you either, haha.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 6h ago

70% accuracy? Buddy, stuff built on ten years of data, you only really know if it's a scam when you actually use it.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 6h ago

70% accuracy? Interestingly, throughout history, whenever someone claimed to have a "complete system," they ended up losing everything in 2018. The data speaks for itself.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 6h ago

That's correct, but a 70% accuracy rate is still a bit uncertain; there are very few that can truly execute stably.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 6h ago

The point is valid, but that 70% accuracy thing... I've heard it too many times. In the end, you still have to rely on your own discipline to survive.

View OriginalReply0