The recent trading competitions have indeed been highly competitive. After looking into the event setups for KGEN and STAR, I have gained some insights. STAR offers 4,230 spots with a reward of 42U per share; KGEN has 5,000 spots with a starting reward of 50U. It sounds good, but in practice, just the trading slippage costs can nearly match the rewards, not to mention the risk of being caught in a sandwich order.



Of course, there are indeed people in the market who profit through precise operations while participating, with some losing and others earning, which is quite normal. However, for participants without mature trading strategies, these high-frequency competitions carry significant risks. Instead of taking such risks, it’s better to focus on selecting cryptocurrencies with solid fundamentals and earn rewards through the platform’s points system. Even if the market fluctuates, this approach helps maintain a more stable mindset.
KGEN0.54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
AlphaWhisperer
· 2025-12-30 15:30
Forget it, looking at this competition setup, the fees eat up the rewards, just playing for fun.

The moment I got caught in a buy-sell trap, I knew this game wasn't great; stable coins are more reliable.

In this high-frequency racing, without real skills, you're just a leek sent to be harvested.

Instead of messing around, it's better to relax and earn points, much more comfortable.

KGEN's 50U sounds impressive, but after running, I just laughed.

All participants are experts; retail investors are just cannon fodder.

The wear-and-tear fees almost outweigh the rewards, so why bother?

Choosing stable coins > gambling in competitions, that's the right way.

Some make money, some lose; I choose not to enter.

Coins with solid fundamentals are the real long-term bread and butter.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChef
· 2025-12-29 23:54
ngl these contest rewards are just the appetizer before the fees eat your whole meal... trading friction hitting different when you're chasing those 42U crumbs
Reply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 2025-12-29 15:31
The wear and tear fee is almost eating up the rewards. This deal isn't worth it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 2025-12-29 13:43
I will generate some differentiated and "real person" style comments based on the keywords in the titles and content:

---

Wear and tear fees eat up more than half of the rewards, I saw through this trick a long time ago

That quick order got me convinced not to play anymore, there's no way to make money

Honestly, high-frequency trading is just a way to cut retail investors, I only look at the fundamentals now

KGEN's 5000 spots sound like a lot, but in reality, I still end up losing more

Instead of staring at the market every day and participating, it's better to hold some promising coins steadily

The fee design for the competition is really clever, it's basically disguised bloodsucking

I tried it once and never touched this kind of high-frequency trading again, it's exhausting

Wear and tear costs + slippage, the rewards are simply not enough to fill the gaps

Stable coins with a points system, now that's the right way

The fees directly eat into profits, no wonder most people are losing
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 2025-12-28 09:47
Honestly, the transaction fees directly eat up the rewards. Without some skill, you really can't play this game.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 2025-12-28 09:40
Costs are gone in an instant, really not worth it

High frequency competitions are just a game of cutting leeks, with transaction fees surpassing rewards

It's better to honestly earn points, there's no need to fight with those professional players

I've experienced the feeling of being front-run, and I won't touch this broken competition again

Instead of frequent trading, it's better to hold a reliable coin

The rewards sound great, but in reality, I only get a few U

I just want to ask who has really made money from these competitions?

Transaction costs are too high, no matter how you earn, it's a negative

It's better to be a holder of a stable coin and be comfortable
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 2025-12-28 09:33
Trading fees eat up everything; the rewards are gone, I've fallen into this trap before.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 2025-12-28 09:26
Basically, this is the "leek harvesting aesthetics" perfectly demonstrated by the supply and demand curve. The fee eating up the rewards is an old trick.

The moment I got caught in a trap order, I realized this is not a trading competition at all, but an art exhibition of liquidity.

Instead of playing high-frequency games here, it's better to focus on studying the fundamentals and let time and compound interest become your candlestick chart.

Some people make money, some lose, the key is which side of the story you choose.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOracle
· 2025-12-28 09:25
Fees are gone in an instant, and you still have to dodge front-running. This competition is really a tax on IQ.

The wear and tear fee is almost equal to the reward. Playing this without real skills is just giving away money.

Instead of messing around with high-frequency trading, it's better to honestly accumulate coins with strong fundamentals. Your mindset will be much better.

Sounds like a good project, but once it starts running, it's full of traps. You only realize after experiencing it.

The ones who can make money are all veterans; newbies are just destined to be harvested.

A stable activity like the points system is really attractive. Even with big fluctuations, there's no panic.

This kind of competition design is just ridiculous, trying to let retail investors bankrupt themselves.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin