Recently, a heated topic has been stirring up in the community, and I want to share some thoughts with everyone. The project that once claimed to be a "revolutionary DeFi innovation" collapsed in a very short time. The token price plummeted from a high level to nearly zero, billions of dollars in funds evaporated, and many core participants were controlled by relevant authorities. Some people in the community are crying over losing their entire assets, which indeed is quite heartbreaking.



But honestly, such incidents have played out countless times in the crypto world. Carefully examining major collapse cases, you'll find that the scripts are almost identical—the promise of ultra-high returns, complex mechanisms that confuse people, and a continuous influx of newcomers. Today, I will analyze how these projects attract people and how they ultimately collapse.

**The ROI Numerical Game**

First, let's look at those eye-catching return promises: 1.2% daily, 41% monthly, over 7600% annualized. Sounds crazy, right? From a different perspective, the current annual yield for bank fixed deposits is about 2%. How can a legitimate business model or investment project continuously generate such outrageous returns? These numbers are speaking for themselves—they are impossible to sustain.

These high-return promises are actually designed to attract participants who want to get rich quick and lack risk awareness. They seem to provide you with data, but in reality, they are selling an "overnight wealth" fantasy.

**The Reality of Internal Mechanisms**

Digging deeper into how these projects operate, you'll find the logic is fundamentally broken:

The project claims to have business activities generating profits, but in fact, there are no real revenue streams. The invested funds are forcibly split into two parts—one part is used to buy the project's own tokens, and the other is funneled into a so-called "liquidity pool." It sounds complicated, but it's essentially a money circulation game. New money is used to pay old investors' returns; as long as new funds keep flowing in, the game can continue. Once the influx of new funds slows down, the entire scheme collapses immediately.

These projects often set up various reward tiers—recruit someone and get a reward, recruit ten and get an even bigger reward. This pyramid-like incentive structure essentially encourages participants to do referral marketing. When many core promoters are controlled because they are involved in such activities, it indicates that regulators have already made a clear judgment about the illegal nature of this model.

**Why Do People Still Believe in These Projects**

This involves information asymmetry. Many participants don't fully understand concepts like DeFi and liquidity mining. Seeing some seemingly technical jargon, combined with friends participating and a lively community atmosphere, makes it easy to get swept in. The project teams exploit this by using some semi-true technical terms to endorse themselves.

**How to Protect Yourself**

The most straightforward advice is: any investment project promising ultra-high returns should make you question it. Markets follow certain rules—there are no stable, sustainable, and outrageously high yields. Any project that promises such returns is either a scam or inherently unsustainable.

Second, examine the project's actual business model. How does it make money? Where do these returns come from? If you can't explain it clearly and simply, there's a problem.

Finally, beware of social pressure and FOMO (fear of missing out). Truly good investment opportunities won't force you to decide immediately, won't pressure you to recruit others, and won't kick you out of groups just because you ask a few questions.

There are many opportunities in the crypto space, but also many pitfalls. Next time you see such projects, I hope everyone can think a bit more before jumping in.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainArchaeologistvip
· 3h ago
Annualized 7600%? Or just stop dreaming, wake up Another pyramid scheme has collapsed, how are there still people believing it? It's all about new money feeding the elderly, as long as it keeps coming, you can keep playing Getting caught recruiting others, serves you right All those technical terms are smoke screens; truly profitable projects don't need to be so complicated Honestly, if the annualized return exceeds 20%, you should ask yourself if you've entered a scam Banking 2% is really not impressive, but it's better than losing everything Liquidity fund pools? Ha, they're just black holes for funds Why do people still believe in these projects? Ultimately, it's greed. If you don't want to get cut, you have to learn to say no
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSellervip
· 3h ago
Here we go again with this trick, when will it ever end? --- Annualized 7600%? Ha, I just smile and say nothing. --- These people are just betting on our greed. --- I've seen through it long ago; I don't play the referral game. --- You're so right, this same routine keeps repeating. --- Friends around me are still involved, and I can't even persuade them. --- Asking how to make money and getting kicked out of the group—this is a signal, isn't it? --- I've seen a lot in the crypto world over the years; there's no such thing as a free lunch. --- It's a pity; some people have truly lost everything. --- The more they explain, the more complicated it gets, and I just feel there's something fishy. --- FOMO kills people; so many have fallen for it because of this.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmarevip
· 3h ago
Annualized 7600%? I just lol. These numbers make my scalp tingle. Honestly, it's a naked Ponzi scheme. It's both recruiting referrals and hierarchical systems. This trick is more blatant than any pyramid scheme I've seen. Truly incredible. The group being accused actually deserves it. Yelling about this stuff every day should have this result. It makes me anxious for them. I just can't understand why anyone would believe this nonsense. Bank fixed deposits are only 2%. Why can this be 7600%? Are they brainless? These days, anyone claiming to have "revolutionary innovation" just gets a straight pass from me. The more they boast, the faster they crash. That's a rule. It's always the same script repeated over and over. And some people actually fall for it. Can't you be a bit smarter, everyone? What I hate most are scammers hiding behind technical jargon—DeFi, liquidity mining, all that fancy talk just to fool newbies. The fact that recruiting referrals has rewards is enough to warrant the death penalty. The regulatory authorities handled this well this time.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxietyvip
· 3h ago
Annualized 7600%? Haha, this number itself is the best proof of lying. Another pyramid scheme has collapsed, but the next scammer has already started selling the next dream. Look at those who were kicked out of the group; ask a few questions and they’ll be instantly removed. It should have been clear long ago. Fund cycling game, new money feeding the old, the pattern is doomed to die. This wave of promoters being controlled and shut down was actually arranged by the system. Quite innocent, really. Bank deposits with 2% annual interest versus 7600% annual interest—any fool would choose. Basically, it’s an information gap; the little guys have no idea what they’re really playing. They can’t even explain real business, and they still want to scam me with DeFi innovation? Thinking too much. FOMO kills without bloodshed; the most dangerous time is when people around you are making money. Of the dozens of billions evaporated this time, how much was the sweat equity of those who recruited others?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)