2025-12-25 18:21:28

There is an interesting discussion happening tomorrow. The topic revolves around the intersection of AI, identity verification, and digital asset ownership — an area that many haven't fully realized how important it is.

The event is scheduled for December 26th (UTC noon). Participants will delve into how blockchain technology is reshaping personal identity and asset management, as well as the role of AI in these processes. For the Web3 and crypto communities, such conversations often spark new ideas.

If you're interested in identity verification, NFT ownership validation, or AI applications in Web3, this is a rare opportunity. See you tomorrow.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetective

· 4h ago

Identity verification + AI, based on on-chain data, is indeed easily overlooked. It's been clear for a while that this is the next hot spot, and this discussion might reveal quite a few details.

View OriginalReply0

ArbitrageBot

· 4h ago

Damn, no one has seriously discussed identity verification + AI before. Must listen tomorrow. This topic is definitely worth paying attention to, but it feels like it's always said to be very important... If identity verification with AI really becomes a reality, that would be awesome. It's the 26th, the timing is a bit awkward. Will anyone go? The current state of identity verification is a mess. Let's see how they explain it. These forums usually don't have much substantive content, but this time the topic is quite interesting. AI + Web3 should have been systematically discussed a long time ago. Looking forward to it. Identity verification is really a bottleneck. Let's see if there are any new ideas.

View OriginalReply0

NoStopLossNut

· 4h ago

Wow, the identity verification + AI aspect has indeed been seriously underestimated. NFT ownership is still too fragile right now. After this discussion, I need to rethink my holding strategy. Tomorrow at 12 noon, right? I'll set an alarm first. This is the real problem Web3 needs to solve, not some shitcoin pumping. I need to hear what the experts have to say; they might overturn some of my previous ideas.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 4h ago

The combination of identity verification + AI feels like it's going to be a big deal. Someone will definitely come up with some new玩法 then. --- NFT ownership is still a mess right now; we really need to have a good chat about it. --- Tomorrow at noon? I need to check the time difference... Something's off, why is it always at this time? --- If AI disrupts the identity system, what should we do if privacy issues arise? --- This topic sounds pretty good, but I wonder if it will just be a rehash of old ideas. --- I'm a bit curious about what new things might come out of this. What is Web3炒作 lately?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 4h ago

Authentication has indeed been underestimated; many people are still tangled up in the trends of shitcoins and haven't realized how crucial on-chain identity is. The combination of AI and blockchain will truly redefine ownership logic. What new perspectives can we hear in this discussion? Be there tomorrow at noon to see if we can find the next narrative angle. Forget it, I still need to go. I feel like this is the real thing worth paying attention to. NFT ownership, if truly re-examined from the perspectives of AI and identity... there's something there.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 4h ago

NGL identity verification is really underrated. Most people are still trading cryptocurrencies, while these folks are building the infrastructure. Wait, AI combined with identity verification? That seems to be the real breakthrough. Tomorrow noon? Considering the time difference... it's a bit tight, but I have to go check it out.

View OriginalReply0