2025-12-25 13:24:34

Currently in the performance sprint period, I noticed an adjustment when logging into the daily check-in feature of a certain Web3 application. Now, it requires activation within the relevant account system to continue participating, and the check-in rewards have also been modified—from original points to 10 $BILL tokens.

Interestingly, the platform's membership card scheme reveals the market pricing logic of the token. Spending 20U to obtain membership benefits, with a bonus of 1000 $BILL and $10 cash, in other words, the value of 1000 $BILL is set at $10, making each $BILL approximately equal to 0.01U. This pricing aligns with the project's previous ICO valuation on a certain crypto financing platform, indicating that the platform maintains consistency in its pricing system. This data consistency itself is noteworthy, reflecting the project's serious attitude towards its token economic model.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletInspector

· 12h ago

Changed the rules again, now even signing in requires account activation? This trick is getting more and more complicated.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 12h ago

Another check-in threshold? That's really impressive, but the $BILL pricing logic is quite transparent, no random price shouting. --- 20U for 1000 coins plus 10 dollars, which is about 0.01U per coin, same as the ICO price... at least the project team isn't scamming, which is quite rare. --- You need to activate to check in, feels like another wave of cutting leeks, but with such a rigorous pricing system, maybe there's still hope? --- Wait, reverse-engineering the price with a membership card... this move is indeed clever, indicating that the token economy isn't just casually thrown together. --- Changing from points to $BILL, during the sprint phase, it still relies on issuing tokens to suck blood, same old trick. --- 0.01U isn't cheap, only 1 cent for ten check-ins, you need to accumulate a lot to make it worthwhile. --- Wow, the pricing system aligns with the ICO valuation, at least it's not a piece of trash project that crashes immediately after launch. --- Activation + token rewards, a standard user-pulling tactic, just see if there's liquidity support later on.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 12h ago

The sign-in rules have been changed again, this time directly switching to tokens. --- Pricing at 0.01U, quite interesting... Is this the price during the ICO? --- You need to activate your account to sign in? The threshold is higher again. --- That membership card pricing logic feels like they've just fixed the coin price. --- Is BILL's recent operation aiming to stabilize the price or to cut the leeks? It's hard to see through. --- Changing from points to tokens, is it really fewer rewards or just a name change? --- Data consistency... sounds good, but I'm worried there might be a twist later. --- A $20 membership card for 1000 coins, is this economic model serious? --- Sign-in activation system, with new operations during the sprint period, user experience drops sharply. --- The issue of a unit price of 0.01, we'll see if it can hold up later.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer