Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Korean Stocks
Real Korean stocks and top assets
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
Aave Brand Asset Proposal Controversy: Governance Process or Power Play?
【Crypto World】The Aave community has recently been embroiled in controversy over a proposal regarding the ownership of brand assets. Here's what happened: a proposal that was still under discussion was prematurely submitted to Snapshot for voting, sparking considerable debate.
Founder Stani Kulechov defended this move, stating that the discussion had already lasted five days and that the entire process was in accordance with regulations. However, this explanation did not quell the controversy. Former CTO Ernesto Boado and Marc Zeller, head of the Aave Chan Initiative, directly criticized this approach, claiming it bypassed standard community governance procedures and significantly reduced the participation of ordinary members. The most intense accusation was that it resembled a malicious takeover.
This dispute highlights a deeper issue—how should DeFi projects balance decision-making speed with community involvement? The Aave incident may serve as a case for other DAOs to reflect on their governance mechanisms.