MCL represents a turning point for Solana's architecture, yet the timeline stretches beyond 18 months. Here's the catch - the core functionality can't wait that long. BA and other protocols desperately need these features now, not in 2027. The gap between what's promised and what's deliverable creates real friction for developers betting on SOL's infrastructure.

SOL3.25%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
MEV_Whisperer
· 2025-11-18 20:04
Well said, 18 months is too long... now BA is so anxious, they can't wait for this damn timeline of 2027.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperer
· 2025-11-18 00:33
18 months? Pump it, developers can't wait that long.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 2025-11-16 02:12
nah, technically speaking if you analyze the actual mempool data here - solana's always been sub-optimal with their delivery timelines. 18+ months for core functionality? demonstrably false prioritization. devs betting on sol infrastructure are literally burning gas on false promises rn
Reply0
PhantomMiner
· 2025-11-16 02:01
It's this same old story again, 18 months? Are you kidding? The developers are starving while waiting.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin