Parliamentary mechanisms that involve collaboration among various factions and the harmonization of opposing interests tend to be prolonged and prone to paralysis.
Illustrative case: In Spain, the intricate legislative dynamics and conflicts between political groups can hinder the implementation of urgent measures.
Preponderance of the majorities:
A parliamentary regime based on majority voting could overlook the concerns and perspectives of minority groups. This can lead to a hegemony of the majority faction.
Illustrative case: In numerous European nations, there is concern about the possibility that strict and discriminatory immigration regulations against minority groups may be a consequence of the dominance of majority sectors.
Vulnerability to populism and demagogic rhetoric:
Parliamentary systems can be manipulated by charismatic leaders skilled in exploiting populist sentiments and demagogic rhetoric to gain power, even when they undermine democratic principles. An illustrative case: in Poland, the Law and Justice party has managed to strengthen its influence through a nationalist and Eurosceptic narrative that has polarized society.
Substantial investment and civic maturity:
The effective implementation of a parliamentary system requires a robust institutional structure, adequate civic education, and an entrenched democratic culture. This implies a considerable investment and prolonged development. An illustrative case: Numerous nations that have recently emerged from authoritarian regimes face the challenge of building parliamentary infrastructure and fostering a mature political culture.
Obstacles in critical situations:
In crisis contexts that demand a prompt and assertive response, parliamentary systems are often perceived as slow and inefficient. This can lead to calls for restrictions on freedoms and centralization of power. Illustrative case: during the COVID-19 health crisis, several countries with parliamentary systems found themselves needing to adopt measures that restricted freedoms and mobility to contain the spread of the virus.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Complexity and delays in policy making
Parliamentary mechanisms that involve collaboration among various factions and the harmonization of opposing interests tend to be prolonged and prone to paralysis.
Illustrative case: In Spain, the intricate legislative dynamics and conflicts between political groups can hinder the implementation of urgent measures.
Preponderance of the majorities:
A parliamentary regime based on majority voting could overlook the concerns and perspectives of minority groups. This can lead to a hegemony of the majority faction.
Illustrative case: In numerous European nations, there is concern about the possibility that strict and discriminatory immigration regulations against minority groups may be a consequence of the dominance of majority sectors.
Vulnerability to populism and demagogic rhetoric:
Parliamentary systems can be manipulated by charismatic leaders skilled in exploiting populist sentiments and demagogic rhetoric to gain power, even when they undermine democratic principles. An illustrative case: in Poland, the Law and Justice party has managed to strengthen its influence through a nationalist and Eurosceptic narrative that has polarized society.
Substantial investment and civic maturity:
The effective implementation of a parliamentary system requires a robust institutional structure, adequate civic education, and an entrenched democratic culture. This implies a considerable investment and prolonged development. An illustrative case: Numerous nations that have recently emerged from authoritarian regimes face the challenge of building parliamentary infrastructure and fostering a mature political culture.
Obstacles in critical situations:
In crisis contexts that demand a prompt and assertive response, parliamentary systems are often perceived as slow and inefficient. This can lead to calls for restrictions on freedoms and centralization of power. Illustrative case: during the COVID-19 health crisis, several countries with parliamentary systems found themselves needing to adopt measures that restricted freedoms and mobility to contain the spread of the virus.