🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
DOGE ETF log in Wall Street: The financialization of the meme economy
The Fusion of Memes and Finance: The Birth and Impact of the DOGE ETF
In September 2025, a slightly sarcastic code flashed across the electronic screen of the New York Stock Exchange – DOJE. This cryptocurrency, represented by the Shiba Inu logo, was once merely a product of programmer jokes eight years ago, but now it has made its way to Wall Street as an Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF), managing hundreds of millions of dollars in assets. When the seemingly contradictory concept of "DOGE ETF" became a reality, a formal game of domestication between internet memes and traditional finance began. The essence of this domestication is both a compromise of grassroots culture to capital power and the financial system's incorporation and transformation of emerging assets.
1. Regulatory Arbitrage: The Compliance Packaging Technique of Meme Coins
The listing of DOJE is by no means a coincidence, but rather a meticulously designed regulatory arbitrage experiment. Unlike the years-long approval tug-of-war for Bitcoin ETFs, this DOGE ETF adopts the structure of the Investment Company Act of 1940, holding 25% of DOGE and derivatives through a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, while the remaining assets are allocated to compliant instruments such as U.S. Treasury bonds, cleverly circumventing the stringent scrutiny of regulators on spot crypto ETFs. This "roundabout rescue" design allowed it to pass smoothly within the 75-day review period, becoming the first "asset with no actual use" ETF in the United States.
This structural innovation reflects a fundamental shift in the regulatory landscape. Under the leadership of the new SEC chair, the regulatory attitude towards crypto assets has shifted from "containment" to "embrace." Compared to the tough stance during the previous chair's term, the new management has opened the floodgates for crypto ETFs by simplifying listing standards. As of September 2025, nearly a hundred crypto ETF applications are awaiting approval, and the successful listing of DOGE undoubtedly provides a replicable template for similar products. The essence of this policy shift is to bring wild crypto assets into the traditional financial regulatory framework, exchanging compliance's "shackles" for market access.
The financial packaging is also reflected in the cost structure. The 1.5% management fee rate of DOJE far exceeds the average level of 0.25%-0.5% for Bitcoin ETFs, and this premium is essentially the "entrance fee" for meme assets to obtain compliance status. What is even more interesting is its tracking mechanism—through the design of holding assets and derivatives via subsidiaries, it avoids regulatory hurdles but may lead to significant deviations between the ETF price and the DOGE spot. Data shows that similar structured Solana staking ETFs have experienced tracking errors of more than 3%, which means that what investors are betting on may just be the "shadow of DOGE" rather than the asset itself.
2. The Triple Paradox: Cultural Tear in the Domestication Process
The birth of the DOGE ETF exposes profound contradictions in the financialization process of meme assets. The first paradox exists at the market functionality level: ETFs are supposed to lower the investment threshold, but they may amplify the speculative nature of DOGE. Data from Bitcoin ETFs shows that the continuous inflow of institutional funds has indeed reduced asset volatility (30-day volatility dropped from 65% to 50%), but DOGE lacks the decentralized financial infrastructure of Bitcoin, and its price relies more on community sentiment and celebrity effects. One analyst sharply pointed out: "This normalizes collectibles, with DOGE resembling Beanie Babies or baseball cards; ETFs should serve the capital markets, not collectibles."
The paradox at the cultural level is even more striking. DOGE was born from an internet joke in 2013, and its community culture is centered around a spirit of "anti-financial elite" satire, with tipping culture and charitable donations forming a unique value identity. However, the launch of the ETF has completely restructured this ecology—when large institutions become the main holders, the community logic of "holding is believing" is forced to give way to the financial logic of "net value fluctuations equal returns." DOGE allows investors to hold it through IRA retirement accounts, which means DOGE has transformed from "the game coin of internet users" into "a retirement asset allocation," leading to a cultural rift that sparked intense debates on social platforms about "whether we have sold our souls."
The paradox of regulatory philosophy conceals risks. The reason the regulatory agency approved DOGE is to "protect investors," but the product design may instead obscure risks. Unlike directly holding cryptocurrencies, ETF shares cannot be used for on-chain activities; investors cannot participate in DOGE's tipping culture nor perceive the true value flow of the blockchain network. A more hidden risk lies in the tax structure—the cross-border transaction costs and derivative roll-over fees incurred by the Cayman subsidiary may erode 10%-15% of actual returns in a bull market, and this "hidden loss" is exactly concealed by the guise of compliance.
III. Power Transfer: The Game Between Wall Street and the Crypto Community
Behind the DOGE ETF is a silent power transfer. The motives of Wall Street institutions are evident: by the end of 2024, Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have attracted $175 billion in funds, and financial giants urgently need new growth points. Although DOGE lacks practical value, its $3.8 billion market capitalization and large retail base constitute a market demand that cannot be ignored. A certain team has validated the business model of "non-mainstream crypto assets + compliant structure" through Solana staking ETFs before launching DOJE, and this product matrix strategy essentially uses financial instruments to harvest the traffic dividends of meme economy.
The policy shift of regulatory agencies has distinct characteristics of political economy. The contrasting attitudes towards cryptocurrencies during different government periods highlight the struggle between traditional financial capital and tech newcomers. The listing of DOGE coincides with the eve of the 2025 U.S. elections, and there are even political figures planning to launch personal meme coin ETFs, making crypto regulation a bargaining chip in political games. When regulators transition from "risk preventers" to "market promoters," the DOGE ETF becomes an excellent tool for testing voter sentiment and capital reaction.
The resistance of the crypto community is showing fragmented characteristics. Early core developers sarcastically remarked on social platforms: "We created a joke against the system, and now the system has packaged it as a financial product," but this voice was quickly drowned out by market enthusiasm. Data shows that the price of DOGE rose by 13%-17% in the week prior to its listing, and this "ETF expectation arbitrage" attracted a large number of short-term speculators, further diluting the cultural identity of the community. More symbolically, the ETF issuer changed the Shiba Inu logo from a cartoon style to a "financial blue" color scheme, and this domestication of visual symbols is precisely a micro footnote of the power shift.
Conclusion: The Twilight of Memes or the Dawn of Finance?
The story of the DOGE ETF is essentially a typical example of internet subculture encountering the financial system. When the community slogan "To the Moon" becomes "price exposure" in SEC filings, and when the social media influence of celebrities is included in the risk disclosures of the ETF, the decentralized core of meme assets is being reshaped by a process of compliance and institutionalization. This domestication may bring short-term prosperity—analysts predict that DOGE is expected to attract $1-2 billion in funds, but in the long run, can DOGE, which has lost its playful spirit and community autonomy, still be called a "meme coin"?
What is even more thought-provoking is that this domestication model is forming a template. Following DOGE, other cryptocurrency ETFs are also being applied for, which means that the meme economy is being transformed en masse into financial products. Wall Street uses the "surgical knife" of ETFs to edit and reorganize the wild genes of internet culture, ultimately producing "financial genetically modified products" that align with capital logic. When memes are no longer spontaneous cultural expressions but become quantifiable and tradable financial assets, what we lose may not only be a form of entertainment, but also the last bastion of the decentralized spirit of the internet.
In this game of domestication and rebellion, there are no absolute winners. The moment DOGE donned the ETF cloak, it marked the ascent of internet memes to the mainstream stage, while also announcing the end of its innocent era. At the same time, the financial market, while gaining new growth points, had to swallow the bitter fruit of speculative culture. Perhaps, as a certain cryptocurrency analyst said: "When Wall Street learns to speak meme language, all that's left is business."