Crypto KOL Community & Market Trends

$CELO trading pair has surged by +9.30%, pushing the price up to 0.06793.

Looking at the 15-minute chart, CELO steadily climbed from its 24-hour low of 0.06169, gaining significant traction before tapping a 24-hour high of 0.07018.

After that sharp vertical spike, the price is entering a brief consolidation phase, holding steady around the 0.06800 level.

Will the bulls maintain control and break past the 0.0700 resistance again, or are we due for a quick pullback? Keep a close eye on this setup!#Get2SharesOfSKHynixAtZeroCost #USMayPCEInflationRisesTo4.1%HighestIn3Years #MicronOvertakesMetaInMarketValue

The most addictive thing in the crypto circle has never been making money. It's that feeling.
When your account goes from 3000U to 5000U, you get very excited. When it goes from 5000U to 10000U, you start fantasizing about the future.
But when the account gets bigger and bigger, you find that your moments of happiness get shorter and shorter. When you win, you feel it's deserved; when you lose, you remember it for a long time.
A few years ago, the first thing I did every day after waking up was check the market. I watched the charts while eating, before sleeping, and even when waking up in the middle of the night. I always felt that missing one minute meant missing an opportunity.
Later I realized that what I really missed was not opportunities. It was life.
When the market is good, I feel invincible. After a round of pullback, I start doubting my own judgment.
Reluctant to sell when it's rising, reluctant to admit mistakes when it's falling. People swing back and forth between greed and fear.
Many people think that trading is a game against the market. In fact, more often than not, it's a game against yourself.
Over the years, I've come to believe more and more in one saying:
Making money depends on knowledge, keeping money depends on mentality.
The numbers in your account matter, but being able to sleep soundly matters more.
Some opportunities can be waited for again if missed, but if you lose your rhythm, it often takes a long time to find it back.
The market will always be there. You don't have to turn yourself into a 24-hour candlestick watcher just to make more money.

$62 HYPE—Are You Getting In or Just Watching?

Three ETFs are grabbing shares at the same time, the protocol’s monthly revenue hit $53.8 million, yet the price has dropped 20% from its ATH. Institutions are buying aggressively, retail investors are panic-selling—who is right?

Fundamentals are hitting new highs; prices are hitting new lows.

This is either a golden pit or a trap.

First: The ETF wave is here, but many are still asleep.

In June, Bitwise, 21Shares, and Grayscale launched HYPE spot/staking ETFs one after another.

Bitwise—a giant in crypto index funds, managing over $10 billion.

21Shares—one of the world’s largest crypto ETP issuers.

Grayscale—the pioneer of Bitcoin trusts.

When three whales swim in the same direction, you’d better not go against them.

BTC and ETH ETFs are seeing net outflows, while HYPE ETFs are seeing net inflows.

Second: Revenue is exploding, but the price is correcting.

Protocol revenue has risen for three consecutive months, reaching $53.8 million in June.

Daily active addresses increased 17.4% in 24 hours, reaching 68,600.

Holder count increased by 1,109 addresses in 7 days.

TVL grew against the trend amidst a 39% decline in overall DeFi TVL.

Third: The unlock on July 6—a bomb or a smoke screen?

On July 6, 9.92 million HYPE will unlock, worth about $610 million.

This is a scheduled linear release, happening on the 6th of every month, not a sudden negative.

Historically, similar unlocks have not caused a crash.

Unlock ≠ immediate selling—most core contributors won’t dump at the bottom.

The truly dangerous unlock is when the project team unlocks and runs away quietly ahead of time.

When everyone knows the risk, it often isn't a risk.

The real risk is the one no one sees coming.

Fourth: What is the technical chart telling you?

Daily level: Ascending channel + cup and handle pattern forming, mid-to-long-term bullish structure intact.

The pullback has tested the $60-$62 zone multiple times and held, which is a strong support area.

Volume increases on rallies and decreases on pullbacks—a healthy correction characteristic.

$60 is the last line of defense for the bulls.

If it holds, it’s a golden pit.

If it breaks, it’s a deep correction.

Bull vs. Bear—you decide.

On one side (the bulls tell a story):

Three ETFs launched simultaneously, institutions grabbing shares.

Monthly revenue of $53.8 million—capturing real value.

TVL growing against the trend, daily active users soaring.

Technical chart shows ascending channel + cup and handle.

The unlock is a transparent release, not a sudden negative.

On the other side (the bears point out risks):

Down 20% from ATH, short-term trend is weak.

$610 million unlock selling pressure on July 6.

BTC fluctuating around $60k, the broader market is unstable.

No new catalysts in the short term.

Key levels:

Support: $60 → $55-$56 (stronger buying zone)

Resistance: $65-$68 → $70-$72 → $75-$77 (ATH)

Short-term traders:

Wait for a retrace to $59.5-$61.5, enter in batches, stop loss at $58.5.

First target $66-$68, sell half; second target $72-$75.

Alternatively: If volume breaks above $65, go long, stop loss at $62.

Swing traders:

Near $60, accumulate core position in batches, target $75-$80+.

Watch volatility around the July 6 unlock—if the unlock creates a low point, add to position.

Long-term target: $100+.

Risk management rules:

Single trade not exceeding 2% of total capital.

Keep total position between 10-15%.

Always set stop loss, never go all-in.

Can you buy HYPE at $62?

When three ETFs are all betting on one coin, what are you hesitating for?

When the protocol’s revenue is higher than Ethereum’s, what are you afraid of?

When everyone is calling it “garbage,” what are you waiting for?

HYPE right now is SOL in 2021—

99% of people thought “it’s already up too much, I dare not buy.”

Yet it went from $8 to $200.

The cruelest truth in this market is:

You didn’t miss the opportunity—you saw it but didn’t dare to believe.

HYPE at $62—

Golden pit or halfway down the mountain?

I don’t know.

But I do know one thing:

When institutions and retail are both in the market, one buying and one selling—

Retail always loses, institutions always win.#0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $ETH $HYPE

Guys, the World Cup group stage is over, let's review my predictions from yesterday⬇️ ● The victories of England, Argentina, and Croatia should all be within the prediction range, which is a straightforward outcome. ● Portugal's draw might be a bit dull, but it also fits the characteristic of strong teams sometimes "playing it safe". ●

A company with a $1.7 billion unrealized loss keeps buying, another with a $13 billion unrealized loss gets roasted — SharpLink vs Strategy, who’s swimming naked?

Both are listed companies, both buying crypto.

One gets roasted, the other gets praised.

What’s the difference?

From June 22 to 23, after completing a $75 million private placement, SharpLink Gaming went on a three-day buying spree, scooping up 39,196 ETH worth about $62.43 million at an average price of $1,595.

Right now, ETH is hovering around $1,570. The Fear & Greed Index is at 18 — extreme fear.

Do you know how much SharpLink is underwater?

$1.79 billion.

With an $18 billion paper loss, in an extreme fear market, they bought nearly 40k ETH in three days.

On the other side, Strategy — holding 847k BTC at an average cost of $75,651.

What’s Bitcoin at now? $59k.

Unrealized loss? Over $13 billion.

Two listed companies, two whales, two messy ledgers.

But the market’s reaction is night and day.

SharpLink: The more it drops, the more it buys, and the market shuts up.

SharpLink isn’t a new player.

This company originally did sports betting promotion, but in 2025 pivoted to an “Ethereum Treasury” strategy. Former BlackRock executive Joseph Chalom is at the helm, with Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin backing it.

Their approach is simple: issue stock, buy ETH, stake for yield.

They currently hold 876,285 ETH, ranking second globally among corporate holders, behind only BitMine. Average cost is $3,609.

At current prices, the unrealized loss is $1.7 billion.

But what did SharpLink do?

After an 8-month pause, they resumed buying for three consecutive days. June 26 bought 5,000, June 27 another 5,000, June 28 a massive 29,196.

Average price $1,595 — near the 2026 low.

How did the market react?

Almost no one criticized.

Because everyone understands: SharpLink isn’t trading crypto, it’s building a position.

They have staking income — 22,102 ETH, which alone netted them over $1.8B. They have index inclusion — on June 29, they were added to the Russell 2000 and 3000 indices, meaning passive funds have to buy in. They have a clear narrative — an “enterprise treasury” for Ethereum.

Losses? That’s just paper. As long as they don’t sell, it’s not a loss.

The market buys this logic.

Strategy: $13 billion unrealized loss, faith crumbling.

Now look at Strategy.

Michael Saylor, Bitcoin’s biggest bull. Holding 847k BTC, 4% of global supply. Average cost $75,651.

Bitcoin is now $59k, unrealized loss $13 billion.

That’s bigger than Dogecoin’s entire market cap.

How did the market react?

MSTR stock fell from $457 to a 28-month low, down 81%.

STRC preferred stock fell below par, from $100 to $75. Financing channels are narrowing.

More deadly — in early June, Strategy sold 32 BTC.

That’s the first sell since 2022.

The “never sell” promise, broken.

Faith, cracked.

So what’s the difference?

SharpLink buys ETH, and it produces output. Staking yield compounds every year, 22,102 ETH given for free.

Strategy buys BTC, and it produces nothing. Bitcoin doesn’t pay interest, generates no cash flow. The only profit model is “wait for price rise” — and now it’s falling.

SharpLink’s CEO said it bluntly: “Index inclusion is an important validation of our ETH inventory strategy.”

Strategy’s CEO? Still tweeting hopium.

One is asset management, the other is gambling.

“SharpLink’s $1.7B loss — market says ‘that’s strategy’;

Strategy’s $13B loss — market says ‘that’s disaster.’

The difference isn’t how much they lose, but ‘what else can you do besides wait for a rise?’”

ETH drops to $1,600, SharpLink buys.

BTC drops to $59k, Strategy gets roasted.

Because the market forever rewards assets with output logic and punishes gamblers who just lie flat.

So what now?

I’m not telling you to copy SharpLink.

But you need to understand one thing:

In this bear market, institutions aren’t betting on “will it go up.” They’re betting on “who dies first.”

SharpLink is betting the ETH ecosystem stays alive, staking income supports it, index funds keep buying.

Strategy is betting BTC can get back above $75K — but before that, its financing costs have already eaten the profits.

Who has the better odds?

“In a bear market,

whoever has cash flow is bottom-fishing,

whoever doesn’t is filling a pit.”#0成本拿2股SK海力士 $BTC #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $ETH $SOL

Reuters reported that on June 27, the US launched a new round of strikes against Iran, following an attack on oil tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran and the US accusing each other of undermining the ceasefire;
Other reports indicate that after the tanker attack in the Strait of Hormuz, tensions have reached their highest level since the interim peace agreement.
USO is currently around $105.48, down 3.5% on the day, but this is a cross-section of volatility before and after the geopolitical escalation, and the risk premium needs to be reassessed going forward.
Oil prices had been falling earlier as the market was trading on "supply recovery";
Now, with another tanker attack and US-Iran strikes, it shows that the Hormuz risk has not been resolved. Crude oil can easily spike suddenly from low levels.
If the conflict does not expand further, a drop in oil prices would still be beneficial for cooling inflation and repairing risk assets.
Once Hormuz transit slows significantly again and insurance rates surge, oil prices will quickly reprice war premiums.
Watch WTI 69-70, Brent 72-75;
The number of vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz;
Whether the US and Iran continue to strike each other.
$CL

Is Machi Big Brother almost broke?
His ETH long position on Hyperliquid has been getting liquidated repeatedly.
Today he was also forced to liquidate.
His account balance is now only $80k.
To raise funds to continue going long on Ethereum on Hyperliquid $ETH
Machi sold #BAYC Bored Ape NFTs at a loss.
🦍
Recently, Machi has sold 34 Bored Apes.
Received 326 ETH in proceeds.
But because he bought them at high prices,
It still amounts to a loss of 399 ETH.
🦍
The biggest loss was Bored Ape #6057.
He bought it four years ago for 76.84 ETH.
The current selling price is 7.65 ETH.
A loss of nearly 90%.
🦍
For a year or two,
Moonlight often opened OpenSea to trade small pictures.
Now I still have a bunch of zero-valued NFTs in my wallet.
Truly a tear of the times.

Strategy’s market cap falls below its Bitcoin holdings net value for the first time—has Saylor’s “perpetual motion machine” finally stopped?

Strategy’s stock price is now worth less than the Bitcoin in its wallet.

mNAV, the ratio of market cap to Bitcoin holdings net value, has fallen below 1 for the first time.

What is mNAV? Simply put, it’s the company’s market cap ÷ the net value of its Bitcoin holdings.

Previously, this figure had consistently held steady above 1.5 for years, even peaking at more than 2×. That meant the market not only recognized the value of the coins it held, but was also willing to pay a large premium for its “leveraged betting game.”

But today—

The market says: Your coins are worth $100, but as a person, you’re only worth $95.

A discount. An inverted relationship. A first in history.

This is the first time since the Saylor model was established.

Unprecedented.

Let’s quickly recap the Saylor myth.

Michael Saylor, the biggest “gambler” in Bitcoin. Strategy’s model is simple: issue stocks, issue convertible bonds, raise money from the stock market, and go all-in buying Bitcoin.

At its peak, Strategy’s market cap was more than 2× its BTC holdings net value.

The market is willing to pay a premium because everyone believes Saylor will keep buying, pushing BTC prices even higher.

It’s a perfect closed loop: stock price high → financing to buy BTC → BTC rises → stock price higher → continue financing…

Looks like a perpetual motion machine, doesn’t it?

But now, this perpetual motion machine is running out of fuel.

Not only is it trading at a discount—what’s even more terrifying is that the financing channels are starting to rust.

Strategy’s preferred stock STRC has fallen to an all-time low of $73.62. Its implied yield has surged to 15.6%.

What does 15.6% mean? It means the market considers this stock extremely risky—requiring very high returns before anyone dares to touch it.

Even worse, Coinbase’s Bitcoin premium index has been negative for 40 consecutive days.

40 days.

U.S. buyers have collectively disappeared. No one is willing to pay a high price for BTC anymore.

The soul-searching question arrives—

Can the Saylor model still continue?

In the short term, yes.

As long as BTC doesn’t crash, Strategy can still prop up its base with its existing Bitcoin holdings.

But in the long term, the problem is too big.

Previously, Strategy’s logic was: When BTC rises, the value of what I hold increases; more importantly, I can issue new shares at high levels, drain cash from the market, and keep buying.

Now the issue is: the market is giving you a discount. No one wants to pay a premium for your “BTC strategy” anymore.

Issue new shares? Issuing at a discount dilutes existing shareholders—Saylor himself wouldn’t dare do that.

Issue convertible bonds? The interest rates are terrifyingly high.

The cost of financing has become unbearable.

“When the market no longer buys into your story, no matter how many assets you hold, you’re just a ‘coin-hoarding whale’—not a ‘financial giant.’”

Previously, Strategy was a “leveraged BTC ETF,” enjoying a double premium.

Now, it may be devolving into an “ordinary BTC holding institution.”

If U.S. stocks keep falling, or if BTC stays sluggish, with mNAV continuing below 1, it could trigger a chain reaction: major shareholders become unhappy, institutions short, the preferred stock collapses, and finally the company is forced to sell BTC to save itself.

That would be the real nightmare.

My take:

The Saylor model won’t die immediately, but the golden era is already over.

In the past few years, he bet on the right direction for BTC.

Now, he’s betting that BTC can rebound quickly and pull mNAV back above 1.

But the harshest thing about the market is this:

“When you need an upward move to solve your problems, it often means the downward spiral has already started.”

So if you’re a long-term holder, keep an eye on mNAV.

If the discount keeps widening, it means the market is voting with its feet.

When the whale starts lacking oxygen, the whole ocean will feel the shockwaves.

Do you think Saylor will sell some BTC to save the company? #0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 $BTC $ETH $SOL

U.S. and Iran are really fighting, yet oil prices won’t budge? Has the market gone mad—or are we?

Missiles are flying, tankers are exploding, and oil prices… lying flat?

On June 27 Beijing time, the 60-day U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement officially became a worthless sheet of paper.

The Panamanian-flagged tanker M/T Kiku was pounded by a drone in the Strait of Hormuz. Without wasting a moment, U.S. Central Command struck southern Iran hard for the second straight day—exploding missile depots and drone facilities, all of them.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is no pushover either. They turned around and launched retaliatory strikes against U.S. military bases in Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, and Bahrain. Bahrain’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has already acknowledged: We were attacked.

Then IRGC issued a statement: Next, they may take “stronger measures” against vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump went straight in with a nuclear-level threat: “If military operations are completed, Iran will no longer exist.”

The Strait of Hormuz—the choke point for 20% of global oil supply—was put on the fire again.

According to the script of decades past, when something like this happens, oil prices should rocket immediately, and Brent should break $100 in minutes.

But guess what?

Oil prices, almost, didn’t move.

Is the market going crazy?

No, the market isn’t going crazy. The market has already learned “selective fear.”

Remember the end of May? The chairman of the Iranian parliament’s committee said one line—“permanently controlling Hormuz”—and oil prices surged 1.4% that day. The market was scared out of its wits.

A month later, missiles really flew, tankers really blew up, and U.S. bases really got hit—but oil prices acted as if nothing happened.

Why?

Because the first time it was called “unexpected,” and the second time it was called “expected.”

The market has already put a price tag on Middle East risk. Everyone has become desensitized to the idea that “something will happen to Hormuz.”

And don’t forget—Iran’s crude oil exports have been quietly falling for the past few months. From 1.7 million barrels per day at the May peak, by June they had already dropped to below 1.2 million barrels per day. Before the ceasefire even broke down, the market had already been pricing in “an early disappearance” of Iranian supply.

By the time it actually happens, oil prices can’t rise even when they should.

That’s called “buy the expectation, sell the fact.”

But there’s an even tougher thing keeping oil prices pinned to the ground:

Rate hike expectations.

Just the other day, Morgan Stanley warned: If the unemployment rate falls below 4%, the Federal Reserve would be forced to raise rates. Kashkari directly said there could be a hike once more before the end of the year.

Think about it—

War → oil prices rise → inflation rises → the Federal Reserve is even less willing to cut rates, and might even raise them → the U.S. dollar strengthens → crude oil priced in U.S. dollars is, in turn, held down.

See it?

Geopolitics pushes oil prices up, while macro tightening pushes them down. Two forces are tugging at each other.

Who’s winning right now? Macro. Because the market fears “no money” more.

“War is short-term pain, rate hikes are long-term pain. The market isn’t afraid of short-term pain; it’s afraid of long-term pain.”

A tanker exploding—that’s today’s news.

The Federal Reserve raising rates—that’s the nightmare for the next 6 to 12 months.

Markets always price the “future,” not “today.”

When everyone realizes this conflict can’t be resolved in the short term, but also won’t immediately drag the whole world into recession—then they’ll put it on hold and instead trade the more certain macro narrative.

That’s why oil prices aren’t moving.

What does this mean for crypto?

Two sentences:

First, the inflation narrative is still there. Geopolitical conflict hasn’t made oil prices run out of control; if anything, it has made expectations of “inflation peaking” even more blurred. That’s not good news for risk assets.

Second, it also shows that—people in the market are no longer that naive bunch who rush in whenever they hear news about war. Everyone is waiting for a clearer signal: Will the Federal Reserve raise rates, and if so, by how much?

So at this stage, don’t expect “a war premium” to prop up a BTC rebound.

What truly determines direction is macro—it's the Federal Reserve—that damned unemployment data.

“Geopolitics determines the reasons for volatility; macro policy determines the direction of volatility.”

No matter how loud the missiles fly, they can’t drown out a single statement from the Federal Reserve. #0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 #美国5月PCE通胀升至4.1%创三年新高 $BTC $BZ $CL

Previously, I wrote a dedicated tweet to share with the brothers how Pudgy managed to survive. Today, let's talk about a personal feeling of mine. I think what really makes Pudgy impressive is that it no longer sees itself as just an NFT project. The logic of many NFT projects is: launch NFTs, build a community, issue a token, and then wait for the next bull run. Pudgy later took a completely different path. It started making toys, building IP, doing licensing, and entering retail.

Fellas, this week might be the most dangerous week of the year.

No doubt about it.

Gold has broken below $4000. Silver has been cut in half. Bitcoin has dropped to $58,000.

"The currency devaluation trade" — is completely falling apart.

Fed Chair Walsh is screaming hawkish on camera every day. The dollar index has surged to 101.37, rising for two consecutive weeks.

In theory, war should be bullish for gold, right?

And yet? On the 26th, the US and Iran just exchanged fire in the Strait of Hormuz, with the US military striking Iranian military targets — gold still dropped without mercy.

The suppressing force of the rate hike narrative is even stronger than war.

But the real storm is still on the way.

Here's the timeline — feel it yourself:

June 30 — End of month + end of quarter, institutions collectively adjust their books for rebalancing. Trillions of dollars in asset rebalancing will drain liquidity.

July 2 — Nonfarm payrolls data released early (due to Independence Day holiday). Expected job growth of 172k.

On top of that — The US-Iran conflict continues to escalate. The Strait of Hormuz could spiral out of control at any moment.

Three devastating blows stacked together.

Analysts have already warned: This week could be the highest single-week volatility risk of the year.

Now let's run through two scenarios:

Scenario A (Low probability, violent rebound):

Nonfarm payrolls unexpectedly weak. Employment data underperforms, and Walsh suddenly turns dovish. BTC violently recovers from $58,000, surging back to $65,000 or even $70k.

Don't kid yourself. You know exactly how likely that is.

Scenario B (High probability, continued bottoming):

Nonfarm payrolls strong. Unemployment rate holds steady at 4.3% or even lower. Rate hike expectations are fully priced in.

BTC directly tests $55k. Can't hold it? See you at $52k.

The current position at $60k is just a midpoint in the decline.

Data from Polymarket — Probability of BTC dropping below $50k by year-end: 62%.

So what to do now?

Don't bet on direction. Don't try to catch a falling knife.

Amid these three devastating blows, staying in the game is ten thousand times more important than making a quick profit.

Here are three survival rules for you:

First, de-leverage. This is not the time to "gamble a scooter into a motorcycle." This is the time to "stay alive."

Second, buy straddles. Buy a Call + Buy a Put, bet on both sides. The more volatility, the more you profit — regardless of whether it goes up or down.

Third, keep cash in reserve. Wait for the dust to settle. Wait for the other shoe to drop. Wait for panic selling to create the real bottom, then enter to scoop up the remains.

Don't try to catch a falling knife.

Wait for it to hit the ground, wait for the dust to settle,

Then bend down to pick it up — by then it won't be sharp anymore.

Right now, the market is a bunch of falling knives dropping one after another.

Gold is falling. Silver is falling. Bitcoin is falling.

Reach out to catch them, and you'll cut your own flesh.

Before Monday, June 30, I cleared all my leverage.

I kept 30% USDT cash.

I placed two orders: one to buy in batches at $55k, and one to chase the breakout at $70k. #0成本拿2股SK海力士 #美光市值超越Meta跻身全美前十 #美国5月PCE通胀升至4.1%创三年新高 $BTC $XAU $XAG

The 5 most noteworthy bottleneck sectors in the AI era:
1. Memory: AI's Granary
1. Micron $MU
What AI servers need most is high-bandwidth memory (HBM). As the number of GPUs continues to increase, each GPU requires more and faster memory.
2. Samsung $005930
One of the world's largest memory chip manufacturers, with a complete DRAM, HBM, and NAND product line. AI data center expansion will continue to drive memory demand growth.
3. SK hynix $SKHY
Currently one of the global leaders in HBM and one of NVIDIA's most important HBM suppliers, sitting at the core of the AI memory supply chain.

2. Connectivity: AI's Highway
1. Broadcom $AVGO
The more AI GPUs there are, the more important data exchange between servers becomes. Broadcom is almost the absolute leader in high-speed switching chips and network connectivity, and one of the most core beneficiaries of AI infrastructure.
2. Marvell $MRVL
Comprehensive layout in high-speed networks, optical communications, and custom AI chips, deeply benefiting from AI data center upgrades.
3. Astera Labs $ALAB
Focuses on AI server interconnect chips, enabling more efficient data transfer between GPUs, CPUs, and high-speed memory. One of the new AI stars.
4. Credo Technology $CRDO
Leader in high-speed SerDes and network connectivity chips. Demand continues to grow as AI cluster scales expand.
5. Applied Optoelectronics $AAOI
Provides high-speed optical modules, an important supplier for optical communications in AI data centers.
6. Arista Networks $ANET
A globally leading data center switch company. Large-scale AI cluster construction almost always relies on it, continuously benefiting from AI network upgrades.

3. Power: AI's Most Overlooked Bottleneck
1. Constellation Energy $CEG
One of the largest nuclear power operators in the U.S. AI data center power consumption is skyrocketing, making stable power the most scarce resource.
2. Vistra $VST
Owns diversified power generation assets including natural gas and nuclear, a major beneficiary of AI power demand growth.
3. GE Vernova $GEV
Provides power generation equipment, grids, and energy infrastructure, a key participant in global energy upgrades.
4. Flex Ltd. $FLEX
Global electronics manufacturing leader, providing manufacturing capabilities for data centers, power supplies, and infrastructure, benefiting from AI hardware investment expansion.
5. Vertiv $VRT
Leader in AI data center power, cooling, and power supply systems. Without stable power and cooling, even the strongest GPUs cannot run continuously.
6. Navitas Semiconductor $NVTS
Focuses on third-generation semiconductor GaN and SiC power chips, helping AI data centers achieve higher energy efficiency.
7. Talen Energy $TLN
Has abundant power assets and actively deploys data center power supply business, an important company in the AI power concept.
8. ON Semiconductor $ON
Leader in power semiconductors, products widely used in servers, power management, and energy infrastructure.

4. Computing: AI's Computing Power Factory
1. Nebius Group $NBIS
Focuses on AI cloud computing platforms, providing GPU computing services for enterprises, an emerging player in AI infrastructure.
2. Cipher Mining $CIFR
Utilizes existing energy and infrastructure, gradually expanding from Bitcoin mining to AI computing business.
3. IREN $IREN
Has large amounts of low-cost green energy, continuously building AI data centers and GPU computing platforms.
4. Applied Digital $APLD
Builds large-scale AI data centers, providing hosting services for hyperscale GPU clusters.
5. TeraWulf $WULF
Develops AI data centers relying on low-cost nuclear power resources, with clear power advantages.
6. Core Scientific $CORZ
One of the largest computing infrastructure companies in North America, continuously transitioning to AI HPC data centers.
7. CoreWeave $CRWV
A star AI cloud computing company, providing GPU cloud services for clients like OpenAI and Microsoft, a major beneficiary of the AI computing demand explosion.

5. CPU: AI's Brain
1. NVIDIA $NVDA
Currently the absolute leader in global AI chips, leading in almost every aspect from GPUs to networking and software ecosystems.
2. AMD $AMD
Continuously launching AI GPUs and server CPUs, increasingly capturing data center market share, one of NVIDIA's most important competitors.
3. Intel $INTC
Has a massive CPU market base, advancing AI chips and advanced manufacturing layout, still with potential for a turnaround in the future.
4. Arm $ARM
Global leader in CPU architecture, from mobile phones to AI data centers, Arm architecture adoption is accelerating, with huge long-term growth potential.
5. Qualcomm $QCOM
Actively deploying in AI PCs, edge AI, and on-device AI chips. As AI increasingly runs on devices, Qualcomm is set to benefit.
Mastering the five bottleneck sectors—Memory, Connectivity, Power, Computing, and CPU—is the key to long-term core assets!

Many longtime fans jokingly say that I’ve become an expert in U.S. stocks now—I know you’re just teasing me!
To be honest, I’m nowhere near an expert. I only started getting into U.S. stocks this year, and there’s no way my understanding could jump up quickly in a short time—it takes long, uninterrupted learning and accumulation.
It’s because this year I set up a professional U.S. stock investment research and analysis team offline. The team’s main focus is investment research; they do information research, data compilation, and reviews and post-trade analysis. I secretly swore that when this wave of crypto going into U.S. stocks hits, I will definitely be one of the people who not only gets to the fish, but gets plenty of it!
The trading logic and decisions I share day to day are also based on combining the team’s analysis with my own views—I don’t simply copy the opinions the team provides.
I also always keep up my own learning pace, combining my real trading experience, continuously reviewing real trades, and steadily refining and improving my entire trading system.
If you’re friends with people who trade U.S. stocks, or if you’re thinking about making the transition to U.S. stocks, you can all feel free to mutual follow. Opportunities always favor people who prepare in advance. By staying committed to long-term accumulation, when the market window opens, we can steadily capture the benefits.

Six types of people who can make money in stocks
Which one are you?
1. Ruthless players: stay out of the market all year, only make two trades a year, take profits and leave without lingering.
2. Long-term players: hold stocks for three to five years, ignore short-term fluctuations, trade time for gains.
3. Day-trading experts: stick to familiar stocks, repeatedly buy low and sell high; when the long-term trend cooperates, they can recover all initial capital and hold remaining positions at zero or even negative cost.
4. Leader chasers: only trade the main sector leaders, avoid weak stocks, strict discipline, and quick moves.
5. Systematic traders: act only on their own trading signals, ignore news, and avoid emotional decisions.
6. Satisfied smart ones: only eat the middle part of the fish, not greedy for the tail, and exit early before the trend ends.

$BASED is showing some serious bullish momentum today, pumping +10.16% to hit $0.07399!

After consolidating around the $0.07000 mark, the bulls stepped in, driving the price up to a 24-hour high of $0.07695 before experiencing a healthy minor retracement.

With a solid 24-hour trading volume of over 32 million BASED tokens, the market interest is clearly heating up.

Are we looking at a temporary bounce, or is this the start of a massive breakout?#MicronOvertakesMetaInMarketValue #Get2SharesOfSKHynixAtZeroCost

Something quietly changed in the $XRP ‌ market and most people are looking at the wrong thing.

Futures activity has cooled down quickly, but spot demand is holding up much better.

Over the past few months, the balance between the two stayed fairly normal, and price traded steadily between the $1.35 and $1.60 range.

Now that picture looks different.

The gap has turned sharply negative as prices dropped from around $1.60 to the $1.18 area.

This shows many short term futures traders are stepping back, while spot buyers are becoming a bigger part of the market.

In past cycles, similar signals appeared when price was already beginning to recover. This time, the market is still trying to build a solid base.

There is no sign of panic selling yet, but there is also no clear proof that the trend has turned bullish.

For now, patience still makes the most sense.

The next move will likely depend on whether buyers can protect support and bring momentum back into the market.

#Get2SharesOfSKHynixAtZeroCost #MicronOvertakesMetaInMarketValue

4/5
Even the name tells a story.
The Musashi Dojo is inspired by legendary Japanese swordsman Miyamoto Musashi, whose philosophy was built around mastering complementary techniques.
Just like Leios: two block types working together for better scalability.