Gate currently supports multiple account-security controls, including login passwords, authenticators, passkeys, two-step login, anti-phishing codes, fund passwords, withdrawal controls, and API permissions. Gate also applies multi-factor authentication across login, trading, withdrawals, and sensitive security changes, alongside IP monitoring, withdrawal risk assessment, and abnormal-activity detection.
If you regularly hold digital assets in your account, the following eight settings are worth reviewing first. None of them can make an account completely risk-free, but together they can make it much harder for an attacker to move from “having one credential” to “accessing the account and transferring assets.”
Do not reuse your Gate login password for email, social media, or other trading accounts.
An authenticator adds an independent verification layer beyond SMS alone.
Gate supports passkeys, which can use device biometrics or compatible FIDO2 security keys.
Two-step login adds another verification requirement each time the account is accessed.
An anti-phishing code can help users identify fake emails impersonating Gate.
The fund password should be completely different from the login password.
Withdrawal whitelists and withdrawal limits can reduce the risk of rapid asset loss after an account compromise.
Unused API permissions should be removed, and users should regularly review API keys, devices, and active sessions.
On the Gate web interface, users can open the account security or security-center section after logging in to review currently enabled login, verification, and fund-protection settings. Similar controls are also available in the Gate App, although exact labels and menu locations may change between versions.

Rather than checking one setting at random, it is more useful to review security in a fixed order: login security → identity verification → phishing protection → fund controls → withdrawals → API and device permissions. This makes it easier to identify single points of failure across the account.
The following eight items can serve as a practical baseline security checklist.
The login password is the first layer of account protection. The most common problem is not simply that a password is “too weak,” but that the same password is reused across email, social networks, shopping sites, and trading accounts. If any one of those services suffers a breach, attackers may try the same credentials on Gate.
A Gate login password should be completely unique and should avoid names, birthdays, phone numbers, common words, or predictable number patterns. Length is often more useful than simply adding one special character, so a longer password made from random words, mixed case, numbers, and symbols is usually a better choice. A trusted password manager can also help users avoid reuse.
If there is any reason to believe the password has been exposed, it should be changed promptly. Gate may apply a temporary security restriction after a login-password reset or other sensitive security changes, limiting withdrawals or certain fund operations for a period of time. This is designed to reduce the risk of an attacker changing credentials and immediately moving assets.
Gate supports authenticator-based verification for login, withdrawals, and sensitive security changes. An authenticator generates dynamic codes independently from SMS and adds another channel of verification.
SMS can still be useful as one security layer, but phone numbers may be exposed to SIM-swap attacks, message forwarding, or telecom-account compromise. For accounts holding meaningful balances, it is safer to use an authenticator together with email and phone verification rather than relying on SMS alone.
When setting up an authenticator, users should securely store any recovery information provided during setup. Do not post screenshots publicly, upload secrets to group chats, or share dynamic codes or authenticator setup keys with anyone claiming to be support staff.
Gate supports passkeys, allowing users to authenticate with device biometrics, built-in secure hardware, or compatible FIDO2 security keys. Depending on the device, passkeys can provide a more phishing-resistant login method than traditional passwords and one-time codes.
The main advantage is that passkeys reduce the usefulness of stolen passwords and codes on fake login pages. Even if an attacker creates a convincing imitation of the Gate login screen, reproducing device-side passkey authentication is much more difficult.
A passkey should not be treated as a reason to disable every other security control. A more resilient setup combines passkeys with an authenticator and two-step login so that multiple independent verification layers remain in place.
Two-step login adds another verification requirement on top of the account password. When enabled, users may be asked to complete additional verification through a bound phone number, authenticator, email address, or other supported method.
The benefit is straightforward: even if the login password is compromised, an attacker still needs to pass another verification layer before gaining access.
However, the security of two-step login depends on the second factor itself. The linked email account should also use a unique password and MFA, the phone should be protected with a device lock and SIM security, and authenticator recovery data should be stored securely. Account security is only as strong as its weakest verification channel.
A Gate anti-phishing code is a custom identifier set by the user. After it is enabled, certain official Gate emails can display the code, helping users determine whether a message is consistent with their account settings.
The anti-phishing code should never be the same as the login password, fund password, email password, or another sensitive credential. It is better to use a dedicated string that exists only for recognizing Gate emails.
If a message claiming to be from Gate does not show the correct anti-phishing code, users should avoid immediately clicking login, withdrawal, or security links inside the email. A safer approach is to open the official Gate App directly or manually visit the official website and check account status there. Even when the code is correct, users should still review the sender address and destination domain because the anti-phishing code is only one verification signal.
The fund password is used for certain fund- and transaction-related security checks and serves a different purpose from the login password.
The most important rule is simple: do not reuse the login password as the fund password. If both credentials are identical, an attacker who obtains one may be able to bypass multiple layers of account security at once. Keeping the two credentials completely separate reduces that single-point-of-failure risk.
The fund password should also not be stored in plain browser notes, chat histories, or unsecured screenshots. Users should never provide it to anyone claiming to be customer support, a project representative, or a security specialist.
After an account is compromised, the step that often turns unauthorized access into actual loss is the transfer of assets out of the account. This is why withdrawal controls deserve their own security layer.
Withdrawal whitelists limit withdrawals to trusted addresses that have been added in advance. If account credentials are compromised, an attacker cannot as easily add an unfamiliar address and immediately move funds. This is especially useful for users who routinely withdraw only to a fixed personal wallet or cold-storage address.
Withdrawal limits can also reduce how much can leave the account within a given period. The limit should reflect real usage rather than being set unnecessarily high. A practical security setup aims to balance convenience with the ability to contain damage if an account is compromised.
APIs are useful for quant trading, bots, and third-party tools, but they can also become high-permission access points. If an API key retains trading or write permissions that are no longer needed, a leaked key may allow actions without going through the normal web-login flow.
Unused API keys should therefore be deleted. APIs used only for reading market or account data should not have trading or write permissions. When trading permissions are required, users should follow the principle of least privilege and use IP restrictions where the current API settings support them.
Users should also regularly review logged-in devices and security logs. Unknown devices, unusual locations, unfamiliar IP addresses, or abnormal login records should be treated seriously. Devices used to access Gate should also remain updated and should not have core operating-system protections disabled.
If an account currently has little security configuration, it can be useful to prioritize the highest-risk areas first instead of enabling features in a random order.
| Priority | Security Setting | Main Risk Addressed |
|---|---|---|
| High | Unique login password | Credential leaks, credential stuffing |
| High | Authenticator | Password or SMS single-point compromise |
| High | Two-step login | Unauthorized account access |
| High | Passkey | Phishing and credential theft |
| High | Fund password | Unauthorized fund actions |
| High | Withdrawal controls | Asset transfer after account compromise |
| Medium–High | Anti-phishing code | Fake emails and phishing links |
| Medium–High | API and device review | API leaks, old devices, abnormal sessions |
For users holding larger balances or using Gate over the long term, the goal should not be to choose only two or three of these settings. The bigger objective is to eliminate obvious single points of failure. An account can have a strong authenticator setup but still remain vulnerable if the email account uses an old reused password, or if an unused API key still has write access.
Gate introduced an Account Protection Plan in 2026 for certain qualifying direct losses caused by unauthorized transfers or transactions. The plan is not insurance and does not mean every account loss will be compensated. Eligibility and any final compensation depend on the specific rules and review process.
The current plan requires users to meet certain security and verification conditions. Its rules refer to controls such as passkeys, authenticators, bound email and phone numbers, two-step login, anti-phishing codes, fund passwords, API permissions, withdrawal limits, and device integrity. Some conditions may need to be maintained before an incident occurs, so they should not be viewed as settings that can simply be turned on after a problem happens.
The main purpose of this checklist is still prevention. Security settings should first be used to reduce the probability of unauthorized access and asset loss, rather than being treated primarily as requirements for a compensation program.
Gate may apply a protection period after sensitive security changes such as resetting the login password, fund password, authenticator, email, or phone number.
The logic is to prevent an attacker from taking control of an account, changing the authentication methods, and immediately withdrawing funds. A temporary restriction creates time for suspicious activity to be detected and reviewed.
The exact duration and affected functions may change as security policies evolve, so users should rely on the current notice shown in their account when changing sensitive settings.
If you notice an unfamiliar login, unknown transaction, unexpected security-setting change, or unauthorized withdrawal, stop interacting through links in emails or messages and instead open the official Gate App or manually visit the official website.
If you can still access the account, review the login password, authenticator, email security, device sessions, and API permissions immediately, and check for unknown withdrawals or newly added addresses. If you suspect the email account itself has been compromised, change the email password, terminate unfamiliar sessions, and reconfigure email MFA as well.
For incidents that cannot be controlled directly, contact Gate through official support channels as soon as possible and preserve relevant evidence such as login alerts, transaction records, withdrawal records, and account-security notifications. The faster an unauthorized access chain is interrupted, the better the chance of limiting additional damage.
Gate account security is not one switch but a set of complementary controls. The login password protects the first access point, authenticators, passkeys, and two-step login add verification layers, the anti-phishing code helps identify fake communications, fund passwords and withdrawal controls protect asset movements, and API and device reviews reduce hidden high-permission access paths.
Completing only one security setting still leaves room for obvious single points of failure. A stronger approach is to review login, email, identity verification, trading, withdrawals, API permissions, and devices together, and periodically remove access that is no longer needed.
For long-term Gate users, these eight settings can serve as a recurring security checklist rather than something reviewed only after suspicious activity occurs. Security features cannot eliminate every phishing, malware, social-engineering, or device-compromise risk, but layered verification, least-privilege access, and stricter withdrawal controls can significantly increase the difficulty of unauthorized access and asset transfer.
Yes, they protect the account in different ways. Using both can create a stronger layered authentication setup than relying on only one method.
Check the authenticator, passkey, bound phone number, logged-in devices, and email access, and make sure the old device no longer has unnecessary account access.
No. The anti-phishing code should be completely separate from the login password, fund password, and other high-sensitivity credentials.
Yes. If an API key was created in the past, verify that unused keys have been deleted and that no unnecessary trading or write permissions remain active.
No. Security settings can reduce the risk of unauthorized access and asset transfer, but phishing, malware, device compromise, social engineering, and user-approved malicious actions can still create risk.
* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.
* This article may not be reproduced, transmitted or copied without referencing Gate. Contravention is an infringement of Copyright Act and may be subject to legal action.





