The ZEUS competition has recently sparked a lot of discussion. Yesterday's entry threshold was around 148,000, while today it has risen to 235,000, an increase of nearly 90,000 in just one day. This rise is not due to the price doubling, but rather a significant increase in actual volume.

However, some question the necessity of this fierce competition. ZEUS is not a mainstream token in the market, and its value is relatively low, only a few dozen dollars. In contrast, previously high-profile tokens like Bull Head, HEMI, and ZENT, priced around one or two hundred dollars, seem to have more reason for fierce competition.

This situation inevitably leads one to ponder: Is it worth investing so much effort and resources into a token of low value? Will it cause participants to bear unnecessary risks? Although competition may drive short-term rise, the sustainability of this model in the long run is questionable.

In the cryptocurrency market, rational participation and prudent decision-making are particularly important. Investors need to weigh potential gains against risks, avoiding being blinded by short-term hype. The direction of the ZEUS competition may provide some insights for market participants: while chasing returns, one should also consider the long-term value and development potential of the project.