Deep Dive into Uniswap’s Fee Switch: How High Can UNI’s Future Value Go?

The Evolution of Uniswap’s Revenue Model: From Trading Protocol to Ecological Platform

Early Uniswap relied on LPs to provide liquidity and profit from trading fees. However, the protocol itself did not directly capture value, making UNI, as a governance token, more dependent on market sentiment and macroeconomic conditions.

But as competition in the industry intensifies, Uniswap’s development logic is changing:

• v4 makes Uniswap a more flexible “developer platform”
• The pluggable hooks mechanism allows Uniswap to have the capability to build a diverse range of AMM products.
• The income structure will expand from a single fee to more ecological value-added services.

This platform upgrade brings Uniswap closer to being a “decentralized enterprise that can generate cash flow.”

Token Supply Structure: The Impact of Burn and Lock-up

The maximum supply of UNI is fixed, so any reduction on the supply side has the potential to increase its value. The key is:

1. Token Burn Mechanism

If the governance proposal allocates a portion of the protocol’s revenue for continuous buybacks and destruction of UNI, it will directly reduce the circulating supply, making UNI a token of the “deflationary model.”

2. Liquidity Provider Lock (LP Lock)

The modular AMM brought by v4 may encourage more long-term LP participation, while some incentives may require locking, thus reducing the market’s available supply.

3. The token unlock rhythm is stable.

The current UNI unlocking is basically completed, and the era of large-scale unlocking causing price shocks has passed, which is favorable for the long-term trend.

Overall: the supply side tends to stabilize or even decrease, providing a medium to long-term rise foundation for UNI.

On-chain capital flow and large holder behavior

Observing changes in large on-chain addresses is one of the most effective methods to determine UNI price structure:

• Exchange balance decline: indicates more UNI has been withdrawn, short-term selling pressure decreases.
• Large investors continue to net purchases: usually indicates strong funds are positioning for mid-term fluctuations.
• On-chain transfer peaks: often occur before and after key price breakthroughs or negative news.

Current on-chain trends show that UNI’s capital flow is more inclined towards “holding coins and accumulating at low levels,” providing certain support for the mid-term market.

UNI Long-term Value: Scenario Simulation

Optimistic scenario

• v4 promotes the emergence of new AMM products in large numbers.
• Protocol revenue steadily rises
• The fee switch is officially activated.
• The token burn rate has increased

The value logic of UNI will undergo a fundamental enhancement, expected to enter a new round of value reassessment.

Neutral scenario

• v4 ecological growth is below expectations
• Governance takes a long time, and the pace of monetization is slow.
• UNI mainly fluctuates with the market.

The price range is mainly fluctuating, but it still maintains resilience in the medium to long term.

Pessimistic scenario

• Increased regulation has led to a decline in on-chain transaction volume.
• Market liquidity tightening
• Large holders concentrated selling

The short-term decline may widen, but the long-term still depends on governance and protocol usage.

How should investors allocate their resources?

Short-term strategy:

• Pay attention to key support levels (such as around 5 dollars)
• Track on-chain whale transfers
• Pay attention to the governance voting time nodes.

Medium to long-term strategy:

• Build positions in batches to avoid a one-time purchase.
• Pay attention to the v4 implementation progress and token burn situation.
• Consider UNI as a “DeFi blue-chip asset” for long-term allocation.

Risk Management:

• Set Maximum Drawdown
• Do not chase the rise
• Avoid heavily investing during peak message times.

Summary

The upgrade and governance reform of Uniswap are driving its token UNI into a new value phase. Monetization, platformization, and reduced supply will become the core forces for the long-term rise of UNI. In the short term, it will still be influenced by sentiment and regulation, but from a structural trend perspective, the investment value of UNI is on the rise.