The relentless sell-off shows no bottom in sight! There are already 50 points of downside potential!

CZ posted this right before the hack.
😲

Google shares suffer a record plunge after earnings! The more it spends on AI, the more worried the market gets. Is the tech giant's cash-burning model failing?

If an address holds a lot, does that make it a whale?
When I open the holder leaderboard and see that the top few addresses account for a large share, I’ll look into what those addresses are used for rather than immediately counting them as several individual whales.
An address could belong to an exchange custodian, a liquidity pool, a lockup contract, or a project treasury. Balances held for different purposes don’t necessarily have the same controllers or beneficiaries.
Likewise, a single holder may use multiple addresses. So a seemingly dispersed address distribution doesn’t necessarily mea

$AMZN SHORT SETUP — SELLERS REMAIN IN CONTROL!
$AMZN has dropped over 10% in the last 24 hours, breaking below its previous support and forming a clear bearish structure on the 1H chart. Price is now consolidating near 226 after a sharp sell-off, and another breakdown could extend the downside.
Entry: 226.10
SL: 231.50
TP1: 223.25
TP2: 219.50
TP3: 214.66
Extended Target: 210.50
The bearish setup remains valid below 231.50. A confirmed break below 223.25 could accelerate selling toward the recent low at 214.66, while a recovery above resistance would weaken the short setup.
Will $AMZN continue

Intel reported third quarter revenue of 16.51 billion dollars, up 21 percent from a year earlier. Adjusted earnings reached 52 cents per share, well above the 41 cents analysts expected. Data center and artificial intelligence revenue hit 7.3 billion dollars, up nearly 80 percent. Despite this, shares fell about 23 percent after hours.
The drop came from fourth quarter guidance. Intel expects revenue between 15 and 16 billion dollars, below analyst estimates near 17 billion. It guided adjusted earnings to 25 cents per share and a gross margin of 38 percent. That is a sharp step down from the 4

Why does the same trading strategy stop working when market conditions change?
Some traders face a puzzling situation: the same entry signal repeatedly generates profits in an uptrend, but triggers consecutive stop-losses in a ranging market; just as they adapt to the range, a trend emerges and they frequently miss opportunities.
This does not necessarily mean the strategy has suddenly stopped working; market conditions may have changed.
First, trending and ranging markets require different decision-making logic.
In a clearly trending market, prices are more likely to continue moving in the es

Who bought the dip on this gold run $XAU (I'm so pissed)
Just as I was about to get in, my internet froze! My spicy beef soup, hot pot beef, cola chicken wings, braised pork rice, beef noodles....
Today I'm a cool, aloof girl craving meat~

Weak. $SOXLB is currently at 85.82, with both the hourly and four-hour trends weak. RSI has entered oversold territory, but hourly trading volume has shrunk to a tiny fraction of its usual level. Oversold only indicates that the price is falling quickly; it doesn’t mean the price is cheap, much less that anyone is really defending the 83.54 support level.
If the price repeatedly tests 83.54 without any increase in trading volume, can this oversold reading still be treated as confirmation of a bottom?
My view: demand for a rebound may increase, but until the structure stops weakening, oversold

How should we read the upcoming $BTC price action?
BTC market analysis (detailed edition) has the answer
Using the 1h and 4h timeframes as examples, let's analyze market depth data
Last Friday, the 23rd, long liquidations triggered a sustained downward move
We took a lot of hits and lost a lot of money that day, so this deserves a closer explanation
This week's key trading ranges are based on Fibonacci levels, combining historical high-volume areas with market depth analysis to identify quality levels, explained as clearly as possible for beginners.
Range 1:
A 5,000-point range from 834 to 78

#BTC – THE BIGGEST CRYPTO HACK, AND YOU THINK THE BULL RUN IS OVER? 😂⚔️🔥
Guys, take a good look at this MONTHLY chart!
A → B → C → D → E
I've seen this movie before!
Every time, we get a nasty correction, everyone panics, BTC tests its 21 EMA, and eventually the market recovers!
Now we're at E, with another ugly red candle and reports of a massive crypto hack. 🤦‍♂️
But look at the chart! The macro structure is still holding!
I'm watching the $77K region, with $70K as deeper support.
Am I saying the local bottom is confirmed? NO!
Am I ignoring a pattern that has repeated for years? HELL NO!

Guys, did you buy the dip in gold? Haha, you should’ve all gotten in at this morning’s levels.

BTC falls to $77k, and I’m ready to buy the dip! But these 3 price levels matter more than guessing the bottom
Bitcoin has fallen below $80k, with $77k becoming a market focal point. Some say it’s a golden opportunity to buy; others say it could fall another $10,000. Honestly, predicting BTC’s bottom is like guessing when your girlfriend will get angry—getting it right once doesn’t mean you’ll get it right every time!
My strategy is simple: don’t go all in, don’t chase rallies, and buy in batches.
First tier: $75k to $77k. If the price shows signs of stabilizing, I may test the waters with 20%

10.30BTC
How are you guys doing? I wonder how well you slept last night.
I didn’t sleep well, anyway. I woke up a little after eight.
I’m done playing. I’m going to get my nephew to link his ID, then apply for a refund as a minor.

A book is like a play jointly presented by two people

If the simulation looks normal, is it safe to sign?
When a wallet shows “how much you’re expected to receive and how much will be sent” before signing, I find it helpful, but I take one more step: what protection does this preview actually provide?
A regular off-chain simulation is a trial run of the transaction in advance. It can help detect anomalies, but “simulation successful” alone doesn’t mean the actual execution will definitely be the same, much less prove that the transaction target is trustworthy.
Some wallets also offer on-chain enforcement checks, requiring the actual execution to

Binance was indeed hacked. Officials estimate that approximately $6.3 billion in assets were affected, making it the largest cryptocurrency hack in history. Around $3 billion has already been frozen, and Binance has pledged to fully compensate victims. Deposits have returned to normal, while withdrawals remain suspended. Officials expect withdrawals to resume within 48 hours.
coin:native