After $NEAR surged to 3.1274, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making chasing less attractive. The move up from 2.4131 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, the price pulls back on lower volume and holds the upper boundary, that would be the new entry logic; if it only pushes up and then falls back, it could be a false breakout. I

In the latter half of the night, the market continued to edge lower amid choppy trading. Yesterday’s updates repeatedly warned that the market lacked a trend and would remain range-bound. Subscription short positions are currently profitable! #Gate股票永续合约覆盖数量行业第一

#Share My Holding Returns 🎉 Win Up to 100 USDT Every Week! Gate Square #WeeklyShare Is Now Live!
📌 How to Join
① Register 👉 https://www.gate.com/campaigns/6244
② Post with #ShareWeekly and #WhereToParkStablecoinsWhileWaiting
③ Share your market views to win rewards!
💬 This Week's Hot Topic
Bullish or bearish—where next? Not sure what to post? Share your asset allocation strategy: How do you manage stablecoins when the market direction is unclear?
💡 Discussion
1️⃣ Hold and wait, or buy gradually on dips?
2️⃣ How do you make use of idle stablecoins?
3️⃣ If the market turns bullish, how wi

I watched it for ages, and the more I looked, the less I dared to act. In the end, it proved that staying put was the right move.
A few days ago before bed, $GRVT had a strong bull-trap vibe, the volume didn’t follow, and the overhead resistance was crushing. I said to stay bullish and not switch sides recklessly, and to hold the short position firmly.
Entry at 0.2933, current price 0.1787, +759.93%—that gave the answer outright. It was genuinely sluggish at first, but the outcome was genuinely sweet.
Close 80% first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. If it keeps dropping, let

This was once the best coin on chain
What happened?

🚨 DOES LEOPOLD KNOW SOMETHING WE DON’T?
Leopold Aschenbrenner reportedly added to his $CRWV position last quarter, reaching 7.48M shares worth ~$744.5M at filing — and reports say he later bought CALL OPTIONS on CoreWeave too.
Meanwhile, $CRWV is now 47% below its 52-week high.
Yet he keeps increasing his exposure.
Does he know something? 👀

$BR English long trade 10x | Demand zone activated, execution beats speculation.
BR has reached the key area where buyers need to add. This long setup has a clear invalidation point, which further strengthens my confidence. Trading plan: - Entry: 0.66133 – 0.66771- TP1: 0.68751 (R:R 1:0.7)- TP2: 0.70284 (R:R 1:1.3)- TP3: 0.72583 (R:R 1:2.0)- Stop loss: 0.63387
Why this structure? - The 4-hour bullish narrative remains unchanged; meanwhile, the 1-day analysis supports further upside from 0.66452, around 0.66133–0.66771. - The 15-minute RSI is 48; this neutral momentum means further upside rema

Watching the market nonstop got annoying, but once I turned it off, I could see things more clearly. With my eyes no longer glued to it, I stopped feeling anxious.

While the market was bottoming out, $BEAT ’s rebound remained weak, and volume failed to follow. Nobody was taking it higher, so I flagged a BEAT short setup around 0.4692. I didn’t call it too aggressively—those who understood would naturally get it.

It weakened directly afterward, and 0.0858, +1608.09% was secured. That was a satisfying bite of profit; the wait beforehand was worth it.

Take 80% off first, and protect the rem

$BNB Defending the key demand zone where buyers are preparing to expand 💥 🐂
Entry: 732.50 - 735.60 ⚡
Target: 737.00, 741.00, 744.04 🚀
Stop loss: 726.97 ⚠️
📌 Sellers are hitting a brick wall around the demand block at 732.50, as bids continue to absorb every attempt to push the price lower. 📊 Order flows indicate that smart money is quietly accumulating ahead of the next momentum move.
⚡ Continued defense of this zone opens the way for a sharp push toward higher liquidity. 💬 Are you bidding on this support flip, or waiting for secondary volume to confirm? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Alway

🚨 PI NETWORK Update
Most people still view Pi only from the perspective of “mining,” but the bigger story lies in what developers are building.
Pi recently added multiple developer features, including local storage, app-specific staking data, and file and video sharing.
The real question now is:
Can Pi turn its massive community into a powerful ecosystem built around practical applications and real-world utility? 👀
The next phase may be more about utility, rather than just mining. 🟣
#pi #pinetwork .

Those who embrace AI will flourish.
Those who don’t will fall behind.
If a company lays off their employees so AI can take over their jobs are missing the point.
They need to RETAIN those employees but have them use A.I. to 5x productivity so the ENTIRE company can grow.
It’s that simple.
NOTE: not ALL jobs can be saved but even the typewriter repairman could have been re-trained in I.T. and they would have been massively needed.

After $LAB surged to 0.05108, I instead took profits on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right around the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.05001 formed a breakout-pullback-rebreakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, only if it pulls back on declining volume and holds the upper boundary will that establish a new entry setup; if it merely pushes above and then fal

Alts are looking very bullish here.
The bottom formation on OTHERS is incredibly clean.
We have a triple tap, with the 10/10 getting swept.
Then, a strong push up into the first higher high 12 months.
And now, a consolidation around that high.
Very nice price action.
Once this chop is done, I am expecting another very strong push higher.
The best period for alts is not far away.
OTHERS will make new highs over the next 6 months, and it will create conditions we haven't seen for a very long time.

$AVAX Short-term bias is bullish, but upside is limited by the market’s neutral sentiment, so chasing highs is not advisable.
The Fear & Greed Index is 50, placing the market in the neutral range, with neither panic selling pressure nor overheated chasing momentum. With BTC yet to provide a clear direction, capital is more inclined to rotate among small- and mid-cap sectors. AVAX is up 1.97% over 24h, with a trading volume of 19.0M USDT, representing a mild follow-through rather than leadership. This indicates that it is a catch-up asset driven by the broader market, rather than an independent

$biketyson
CbyTNf7UPzvewHh4Zp6umogM2RWahhmGRJWLJnPwpump

📈 Bitcoin Road to $90,000 May Include One More Major Higher Low
Bitcoin’s Current Range Mirrors a Key 2023 Structure as $70K–$90K Levels Come Into Focus.
Bitcoin’s long-term chart shows a recurring sequence of rally, consolidation, downside liquidity sweep, and renewed expansion. The current structure is developing between roughly $60,000 and $84,000, following the decline from the chart’s major high near $124,000–$126,000.
The chart also highlights a 2023 structure as a historical comparison. The price levels and sequence are similar in form, although the present structure is occurring at su

$SKYAI I bet this move will retrace to 0.038. Posting this as proof—if you disagree, take a screenshot and come back tomorrow to prove me wrong.
Current price: 0.0510, down 16% in 24 hours, with a high of 0.0630 and a low of 0.0496, and 15.4M in trading volume. Given this volume relative to the size of the drop, this isn’t panic selling that has run its course—someone is still exiting. Looking at the on-chain data, two of the top 50 addresses have been continuously selling in the 0.058-0.062 range, with every rebound being pushed back down. I’ve seen this structure too many times: a typical di

$CAT
It held the support band and did not lose it. If it loses it, it could start a correction