CrushBtc

Me and my 5.6 SOL Ultra right now.

As AI models become increasingly powerful, prompts remain an indispensable part of the process.

Move mountains like Yu Gong?

After I finish the tasks currently on my plate, I might join this challenge.

For me, what I want to know most right now is: The context lengths of the three models. GPT-5.5’s context window is too short. When dealing with complex tasks, it often loses important memory. It also shows some tendency to avoid complex tasks, perhaps related to OpenAI’s

codex: Diligence can make up for lack of talent—one token earned, one reward gained

This is the token I burned last month by myself.

Help: Does anyone know how to get the Chainlink API key?

It would be great if Twitter had more bloggers like this.

Apply ➕1

I mentioned three directions in this post, and they are currently being validated.
I admit that there is some speculation involved, but the directions are all substantive.

Every time security issues are brought up in the circle, everyone is on high alert—saying that a gentleman should not stand under a dangerous wall.
And when it comes to foreseeable security problems, it’s right here at the transit/intermediate stage that people rush in eagerly.

Whoever uses relays, I really will laugh at who 🤣 This thing has nothing to do with character, technology, or usage methods. Basically, it's about betting on human nature with temporary convenience, ignoring long-term risks. Especially when it involves Web3, data security is even more important.

Working on a project is still too expensive. Last month, I already burned 2wu credits on Codec5.5. Back then, the solution was using a team parent account plus sub-accounts, and a cheap channel pro 20x. But now the cheap channels are gone, so I opened the regular-priced plan myself. I first opened pro 5, and then after I used up the credits, I opened 20x—so one account is 30x. But now I’ve already opened two pro 20x accounts.

A quick addition: some people use this to claim that transfer stations won’t run into this situation, thereby ignoring the risks introduced by the transfer station mechanism. I think this is unacceptable. I believe it might be because: the number of transfer numbers is relatively large; in that case, by re-entering Codex, you can break the sticking/adhesion logic. Switching to a different account can avoid the compute power limit of a single account. In short, we can only say there are many transfer-station accounts, but we cannot say that transfer stations are a good solution.

Today, when using Codex 5.5, I felt the efficiency was very low, responses were slow, and it always failed to understand my intentions. It also kept showing the following message: Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model. First, I ruled out quota issues; I’m using Pro 20x, with plenty of window capacity. Solutions and attempts: Switch accounts and IP, it worked for a little while, but then it showed the same message again.

Looking for an affordable, reliable RPC.

sam: Thanks for supporting the official channel. I’ll go ahead and block the channel ID to make up the compensation for our Pro users.

WOC, I suddenly realized that my Pro quota has been refreshed.
Originally, we were about to run out of the 7-day quota in two days and I was worried about whether to renew it.
But just now, I suddenly found that Sub2 has been refreshed.
I thought it was stuck, but when I checked the official website, I saw I can use it beautifully again.