GeniusGirlA

I have also experienced something similar to what happened to Jensen Huang: opponents seized on a baseless pretext, exaggerated it, used public opinion to smear me, and pressured me through administrative and judicial proceedings.
Perhaps this is why I feel such deep empathy for Jensen Huang over his being framed.
This was the most important lesson in political maturity of my life. I came to deeply realize that this world is fundamentally anti-intellectual: the public is easily influenced by the media, and whoever controls the coercive machinery of the executive, legislative, law enforcement,

Honestly, I think Dario and Sam are both misanthropes. They want to build a totalitarian world through closed-source AI, handing out UBI to keep ordinary people like pigs.
As a result, the first person they drove out was Jensen Huang.

Why do you think crypto can emerge unscathed when the AI bubble takes a hit? Are its fundamentals stronger, or does it have more capital?

Jensen Huang being forced out of Nvidia is akin to the assassination of Godfather Corleone.
Yet one person's departure marks the end of an order.

A mix of emotions.
I’m quite interested in graphics cards themselves, and have also studied the corporate histories of Nvidia and AMD in detail. Jensen Huang has undoubtedly been essential to Nvidia’s repeated, forward-looking successes: from gaming to crypto to AI, Jensen has consistently bet on the next big era for parallel computing chips and prepared the technology in advance.
They seized on issues with his personal conduct, used the media to build momentum, and played up unverified national security and professional ethics concerns, ultimately driving Jensen out of Nvidia.
A microcosm of

The investigation into Jensen Huang is political. If Jensen really steps down, it could mark the beginning of the AI bubble’s collapse.

Of Rilke’s poems, my favorite is not the famous “Whoever is lonely now will remain lonely forever,” but rather “I am thrilled like the sea at recognizing the storm.”
I have always firmly believed that people live by storms—whether we call them romanticism or grandeur. They drag us away from life’s absurdity, mediocrity, and chaos, and lead us to devote ourselves to the god of art in a state of passion.
To recognize the storm—is it an old acquaintance after all? To be thrilled like the sea—is the sea ebbing and flowing along with me? Or is the storm, after all, made by the sea itself—and am I t

This world is especially unfriendly to Asian men, particularly Chinese men. Westerners are politically predisposed to discriminate against and feel hostility toward you because of propaganda, and because you’re a man with no sexual value, they won’t help you out of “chivalry.” Even when people talk about DEI, Chinese men are never included.
Chinese men face a “double silencing” in identity politics: abroad, they’re at the bottom of a system of structural discrimination; back home, they’re told they’ve enjoyed the structural benefits of a patriarchal society. There’s also a dating culture here

Advocating that AI is a threat (funded mainly by AI giants such as OpenAI) is essentially modern-day Prohibition.
Moral crusaders and organized crime join forces to create legal barriers around a necessary commodity in order to reap monopoly profits.
The two groups most supportive of Prohibition are strict Puritans and moonshine merchants.
A new essential commodity will inevitably spark an industrial revolution of some form and scale. In the process, ethics and fairness will be ignored in the pursuit of the efficiency deemed necessary for technological progress, and monopolies will be created.

Max Weber did not suddenly collapse one day.
In 1897, at 33, he was already a professor at the University of Heidelberg, working for a long time at an almost punishing pace. That year, he had a fierce argument with his father over the way he treated his mother; his father died not long afterward, and they never reconciled. This conflict may not explain everything, but it became the heaviest blow before his mental breakdown.
He returned to the lecture hall for a time, but his condition never truly improved. Anxiety and insomnia repeatedly worsened, and reading, writing, speaking, walking, and e

If you were a rich kid born into a wealthy family, what would you do?

The nation-state is a concept invented only in the modern era.
Before the invention of the nation-state, people were more familiar with empires and kingdoms—the empire used civilization as the basis for national unity and stability, as with Chinese civilization and Greco-Roman civilization; the kingdom used bloodline and royal authority as the basis for national unity and stability, as with the Frankish Kingdom and the Kingdom of England.
Because the nation-state was invented, people were forced to search history for grounds to establish “national identity.” Are the French and Germans nations?

The name of the country Türkiye is particularly interesting—it means “the land of the Turkic people.”
It is similar to Indians calling their country Anglusstan, believing that their country is the land of the Anglus people, and then claiming that all English-speaking countries are within their sphere of influence.
The difference is that the Anglus people are too powerful for the UK and the US to ride their coattails; but the Turkic people have no powerful state or shared national identity, so Türkiye uses the Pan-Turkic narrative to glorify itself.
In reality, the Turkish people are simply the

Napoleon and de Gaulle shaped a strong state, a shared national identity, a secular public order, and the capacity to act for the Republic.
When the government appears unable to control its borders or unwilling to uphold public rules, ordinary people feel that the Republic only demands that they obey the rules while being unable to protect them.
The French have failed to respect Napoleon’s and de Gaulle’s republican tradition, yet pride themselves on being liberal democrats and have been overly tolerant of Islam and illegal immigration, thus paying the price.
France has lost its “Frenchness,”

When ambition exceeds ability, it is called aiming too high.
But if ambition does not exceed ability, how could it be called ambition?
Every ambitious person waits for fate to favor them once, as long as they do not die.
For this, you must be prepared to try repeatedly and suffer setbacks, as well as have the resolve to try one more time, forever.

I have to say, the philosopher is a pretty good trader—honestly, possibly one of the best.
He just needs to improve his entries, exits, narrative analysis, research process, performance at critical moments, adaptability, position sizing, intuition, time in the market, risk management, patience, group chat communication, stop-losses, discipline, pattern recognition, sleep schedule, journaling, wallet tracking, workplace organization, timing, conviction building, knowing when to sit tight, and overall understanding of crypto.