Post

The U.S. is making AI policy, and there are clearly two paths: talking about safety while letting “obedient AI” grow unchecked. That Stanford guy put it bluntly: the goal is gladiator AI, one that does whatever it’s told. The industry has a lot of lobbying power, so naturally the rules are getting looser. In the end, ordinary people are the ones who pay the price. If you think I’m talking nonsense, save a screenshot. #AI

View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
PhishSocDecrypt
2 hours ago
That Stanford guy put it pretty bluntly—the term “Gladiator AI” is so apt
0View Original
LimitOrderGate
5 hours ago
Security slogans ring loud, but lax rules are where the real money lies
0View Original
DrawdownMeasurer
5 hours ago
Screenshot saved; just waiting to be proven wrong or become a legend
0View Original
ColdStorageArtist
5 hours ago
Same old script: moral posturing, then letting things slide
0View Original
StopLossPianist
5 hours ago
Two paths? I see only one: whoever pays sets the tone
0View Original
WhaleTailWitness
5 hours ago
Those who foot the bill are always the last to know that the rules have changed
0View Original
TrendlineArtist
5 hours ago
First Review
Compliant AI can scale up; disobedient AI can't even rent a server
0View Original