Post

China talks loudly about peace on Ukraine, but when it comes to urging Russia to take a substantive step, its actions are almost nowhere to be seen. It hasn’t called for a halt, tied strategic cooperation to progress toward peace, or used what little leverage it has. The meeting with Steinmeier, though, made the point clear: Beijing doesn’t want to get dragged in. Let’s check back next week to see if that’s right.

View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
Don’tRushToDoubleItYet.
2 hours ago
It’s hard to justify not calling for them to stop; they could at least make a statement.
0View Original
CandlePatternCollector
3 hours ago
Calling for peace is a posture; actually getting involved comes at a cost. This logic isn’t hard to understand.
0View Original
RarityInsider
3 hours ago
Let's see how the follow-up goes next week before setting the tone; it's too early to draw conclusions now.
0View Original
WoolHarvester
3 hours ago
The wait-and-see stance is clear—they don’t want to be a mediator, just an observer. Pretty pragmatic.
0View Original
AltcoinCollector
3 hours ago
Steinmeier put it pretty bluntly: Beijing is indeed drawing a clear line.
0View Original
GasScavenger
3 hours ago
Separating strategic cooperation from progress toward peace makes the priorities clear.
0View Original
ArbitrageHunter
3 hours ago
First Review
Having leverage and choosing not to use it ultimately comes down to interests outweighing moral pressure.
0View Original