Post

Germany shut down nuclear plants that were still operational, and electricity prices and carbon emissions both went up. Is that environmentalism or shooting itself in the foot? Shut off stable baseload power and make up the difference with wind and gas, passing all the volatility on to ordinary people’s bills. Energy policy has turned into a game of market timing: politicians sell high and buy low, while factories foot the bill. Maybe I’m wrong—just waiting to be proven wrong.

View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
BitcoinPilgrim
an hour ago
Wind and gas are at the mercy of the weather, and energy storage hasn’t kept up. Japan went through this same script after Fukushima in 2011, then quietly restarted it.
0View Original
QueuePosition
2 hours ago
Politicians are even slicker at selling high and buying low than DeFi farmers, passing all the costs on to manufacturing. Very Web3—decentralized risk, centralized gains.
0View Original
LayerCake
2 hours ago
Nuclear power is being shut down faster than Soviet jokes, only for coal to be burned to fill the gap, pushing carbon emissions up instead of down—a classic paradox of environmental fundamentalism.
0View Original
VolFisher
2 hours ago
With baseload gone, the power grid is swinging wildly like crypto charts, and big industrial power users are the first to bail.
0View Original
BuidlerPreacher
2 hours ago
This isn’t an energy transition; it’s dismantling the industrial base for votes. They’ll learn their lesson when electricity prices skyrocket again this winter.
0View Original
VolumeOracle
2 hours ago
First Review
The Greens are winning big, and factories are running at full tilt.
0View Original