Post

Funding rates are insanely negative, and longs are getting crushed—this all feels very familiar. Take some major perpetual contracts recently: funding rates repeatedly dipped into the -0.03% to -0.08% range. With settlements every 8 hours, longs not only have to endure falling prices but also keep paying shorts. The higher the leverage, the more painful this “lose once on price, then lose again on funding” effect becomes. Once market sentiment shifts, crowded longs become fuel for a cascade of stop-losses, making the price action look especially brutal.



What’s the state of the L2 sector now? On-chain trading volume is split roughly between mainnet and a handful of leading rollups. New projects are still issuing tokens, but very few are actually generating revenue. Public data from L2Beat and elsewhere also makes it clear that the top rollups capture most of the L2 ecosystem’s TVL and trading activity. Even when smaller projects issue tokens and offer incentives, it’s hard for their daily active users and fee revenue to sustain the narrative. After the valuation selloff, many assets have fallen to prices that only reflect their ability to “stay alive”: the teams are still there, TVL is still there, and fee-sharing revenue is still there. Some protocols even generate annualized fee revenue in the millions of dollars, yet the market prices them as if they were going to zero. For example, some L2 infrastructure tokens have fallen 80%–90% from their highs, with market caps now approaching or even below a conservative estimate of “team cash + existing TVL + ongoing fee-sharing revenue.” Value investors see this kind of mispricing as an opportunity, not a risk.

My approach is simple: I don’t try to call the bottom. I buy in batches when it comes to L2 infrastructure with real revenue and real cash-flow sharing, and the uglier the price action gets, the more I buy. You never guess your way to the bottom; you get there through position sizing and discipline. After a long period of sideways trading, volatility compresses, and the market will eventually choose a direction. But before it does, be clear about whether you’re holding an asset or a story. Behind an asset are revenue, fee-sharing, a team, and TVL; behind a story is nothing but the next wave of sentiment. If you disagree, explain why.
View Original
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
PFP_Psychology
2 hours ago
Funding rates are an emotional thermometer at times like this; when they turn extremely negative, you should instead watch out for a short trap.
0View Original
DegenButScared
2 hours ago
Negative funding rates are certainly a grind, but they also show shorts are betting aggressively; reversals often happen at times like this.
0View Original
SatoshiShadow
2 hours ago
L2s are fiercely competitive right now, but once the dust settles, protocols with real fee sharing may be the last ones standing.
0View Original
MultiChainGuard
2 hours ago
Don’t try to call the bottom; just accumulate tokens. This is worth writing on the first page of your trading journal.
0View Original
MemeArtCollector
2 hours ago
Projects that are still alive after an 80%–90% drawdown from their highs have teams whose resilience is actually underrated.
0View Original
ContractReader
2 hours ago
First Review
Buying revenue-generating L2s in batches is far more reliable than betting on narratives; cash flow doesn't lie.
0View Original