Gate’s net inflow surges to second globally! Is competition among trading platforms no longer just about trading fees?

Gate ranked second globally in net inflows over the past 30 days. Beyond the ranking itself, this raises a question worth considering: what exactly are crypto trading platforms competing on?
If platforms were shopping malls, trading fees would be like discounts, the trading experience like the shopping environment, and asset liquidity would determine whether customers can buy and sell smoothly. Discounts alone may not be enough to keep customers, and a busy mall doesn't necessarily mean business is actually good.
Net inflow rankings offer a window into how funds move between platforms, drawing market attention to those changes. But they are not a comprehensive ranking of overall strength, nor can they alone prove user loyalty, profitability, or security.
To understand the reasons behind the ranking, we need to look further at market depth, trading volume, user activity, products and services, and the methodology used to compile the data. Different metrics tell different stories; you can't declare the competition over based on a single scorecard.
For platforms, attracting funds in the short term is certainly worth attention, but providing stable, transparent services over the long term is just as important. For users, choosing a platform shouldn't come down to rankings alone; they should also consider their own needs, asset security measures, and potential risks.
After all, traffic can attract onlookers, but the experience is what can convince users to stay.
What do you think will be the most important competitive edge for trading platforms in the future: fees, liquidity, or security and service?

$NVDA