Post

10.6 Market Analysis (Short-Term Bearish Structure + ETF Large Inflows Turning into Outflows)


Bearish Logic
Bitcoin has been rejected after rising to around $87,000 three or four times since September 21–23. Repeated rejection at the same level indicates real overhead supply, rather than an isolated wick.

The macro environment is also unhelpful. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is around 5.32%, near its highest level since 2002. Treasuries pay interest, while Bitcoin does not; at this yield level, allocators have no compelling reason to chase higher prices. Weak nonfarm payrolls only reduced the probability of an October rate hike; they did not bring down long-term yields. The Nasdaq is still making new highs, while crypto is clearly underperforming stocks, and capital is more willing to remain in AI stocks.

Sentiment and leverage are relatively crowded. The Fear & Greed Index is around 67–73, still in the greed zone; 24-hour liquidations are approximately $194 million, with long liquidations exceeding short liquidations. After multiple failed attempts to rally in the greed zone, this is usually a position for reducing exposure rather than adding leverage. ETF net inflows last week were approximately $241 million, noticeably weaker than the September wave, and spot buying cannot absorb the selling pressure above $87,000.

Key levels to watch:
$87,000–$88,000: A supply zone where multiple attempts have failed; some view it as a sweep zone for clearing the liquidity above before reversing lower
$84,000–$85,000: Today's first support level and a dense cost basis area; if the daily chart cannot reclaim it, the bullish structure starts to deteriorate
$82,000–$83,000: The first target zone; a break below this area would accelerate the bearish move
Below that, only a break below $77,000 would warrant revisiting the area around the July low. That is not the base case at this point.

Structurally, this is a converging triangle formed by rising support and horizontal resistance. False breakouts become more common as price approaches the apex. The bearish scenario is to first sweep $87,000–$88,000, then fall back to $82,000–$83,000, and target $77,000 after breaking below $81,000. Even without first sweeping higher, a direct break below $84,000 would lead to a similar path.

The bearish view would be invalidated if the daily close holds above $87,500, Treasury yields decline, and daily ETF inflows increase again to several hundred million dollars.

For now, it is advisable to stay on the sidelines and wait for the consolidation at the end of the triangle to play out before entering a trade.
View Original
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.
BTCBTC-1.05%

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
币圈里看人生
a day ago
1111111111111111111111111111111
0
HoushanRenA
a day ago
Author
It broke below, guys—the 👀8.2-8.3 support
0View Original
SevenWhaleLord
a day ago
The current setup is “weakening across all timeframes, but extremely oversold in the short term (1h/4h).” The 1-hour RSI has fallen to 8.65, an extremely rare reading, indicating that bearish momentum has been excessively released in the short term. From the afternoon into the evening, there will likely be two possible scenarios: first, sideways consolidation above $2600 to repair the indicators; or second, a wave of “oversold rebound” (V-shaped reversal) to retest $2645-$2650. However, given the ferocity of the decline, blindly bottom-fishing is not recommended, and chasing shorts is strictly prohibited!
0View Original
LiderVitria
a day ago
Let’s go all in.
0View Original
CryptoSpecto
2 days ago
What’s your take on BTC? 👀
0
Yuhuan
2 days ago
Gibberish
0View Original
GateUser-f78ad60f
2 days ago
rise sharply
0View Original
GateUser-a8d5431c
2 days ago
Come on in.
0View Original
1930
2 days ago
ETFs already saw net outflows yesterday—is that a bad sign?
0View Original
AlwaysTakeProfitAt888Daily
2 days ago
First Review
What do you think of BTC? 🤔
0View Original
View More