Post

This is the part of the tokenization debate that matters most. Tokenizing stocks isn’t just about moving existing assets onto new rails or making settlement faster. The bigger question is: does tokenization actually expand access? If public companies can still decide who can

This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
JunoGendarme
2026-09-14
Therefore, the narrative focus of RWA should be on compliant financial inclusion, not T+0.
0View Original
DegenLite
2026-09-12
Well said. True access is not technical reachability, but who the rules allow to enter the arena.
0View Original
MultiSigSweeper
2026-09-11
Looking forward to seeing which jurisdiction takes this step first and writes access into the underlying logic of securities law.
0View Original
BearMiner
2026-09-11
If publicly listed companies can still pick and choose their users, whether it’s on-chain or not is irrelevant—it’s essentially still a gated community.
0View Original
OscillatorCollector
2026-09-11
You’ve nailed the core contradiction. If tokenization is merely switching to a different ledger while the barriers remain unchanged, how is that any different from TradFi?
0View Original
ChatroomOrchid
2026-09-11
First Review
Speed is only a superficial metric; broad accessibility is the real test.
0View Original