Post

This is the part of the tokenization debate that matters most. Tokenizing stocks isn’t just about moving existing assets onto new rails or making settlement faster. The bigger question is: does tokenization actually expand access? If public companies can still decide who can

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
MultiSigSweeper
an hour ago
Looking forward to seeing which jurisdiction takes this step first and writes access into the underlying logic of securities law.
0View Original
HundredPips
an hour ago
Many people haven’t thought this through: tokenization’s enemy isn’t efficiency—it’s permission.
0View Original
BearMiner
an hour ago
If publicly listed companies can still pick and choose their users, whether it’s on-chain or not is irrelevant—it’s essentially still a gated community.
0View Original
OscillatorCollector
an hour ago
You’ve nailed the core contradiction. If tokenization is merely switching to a different ledger while the barriers remain unchanged, how is that any different from TradFi?
0View Original
ChatroomOrchid
an hour ago
First Review
Speed is only a superficial metric; broad accessibility is the real test.
0View Original