Post

A True Bull Market Isn't Necessarily Afraid of Rate Hikes



Whenever the market hears the words “rate hikes,” it immediately starts talking about a bear market.

But looking back through history reveals a very counterintuitive phenomenon:

Many major bull markets actually made it through rate-hike cycles.

In 1994, the Fed hiked rates rapidly.
The federal funds rate rose from 3% all the way to 6%.

The U.S. economy did not collapse.
Corporate earnings continued to grow.
The most explosive phase of the 1990s bull market followed.

The period from 2004 to 2006 was even more typical.

The Fed hiked rates 17 times in a row.
Rates rose from 1% all the way to 5.25%.

What about U.S. stocks?

They did not enter a bear market directly because of the rate hikes.

The S&P 500 continued rising, not actually peaking until October 2007.

Now look at the most recent cycle.

In 2022, the Fed began the fastest rate-hike cycle in decades.
Rates rose from near zero all the way to 5.25%–5.50%.

But after bottoming in October 2022, the S&P 500 instead reentered a bull market in a high-rate environment.

So what history truly tells us has never been:

Rate hikes = bear market.

Nor is it:

Rate hikes = bull market.

What truly determines bull and bear markets is:

Whether the economy and corporate earnings can withstand the interest rate.

Why do stocks sometimes continue rising during rate hikes?

Because rate hikes by the central bank may themselves indicate that:

The economy is still strong.
Demand is still strong.
Employment is still strong.
Companies are still making money.

The central bank only needs to hit the brakes because the economy is running too fast.

As long as the pace of corporate earnings growth can cover rising financing costs, stocks can fully continue rising while rates are being hiked.

The truly dangerous part is the next stage.

Rate hikes

Financing becomes increasingly expensive

Companies begin reducing investment

Capital expenditure declines

Earnings expectations are revised downward

Credit spreads widen

Unemployment rises

Only then does it transmit to the stock market

2007 was the classic example.

What truly killed the bull market was not the rate hikes that began in 2004.

Because after the rate hikes, U.S. stocks rose for another three years.

The real problem emerged after high rates were ultimately transmitted into real estate, leverage, and credit markets.

So in the current environment, I would not immediately conclude that the bull market is over just because the market has started pricing in Fed rate hikes again.

What I am really watching now are three things:

Whether AI capital expenditure has begun to decline.

Whether corporate earnings have begun to be revised downward.

Whether problems have begun to emerge in credit markets.

Especially in this AI cycle.

As long as companies like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta are still spending heavily to build data centers.

NVDA orders have not fallen significantly.

MU and Hynix’s HBM has not weakened significantly.

SNDK’s enterprise SSD demand has not fallen.

And credit spreads have not suddenly widened.

Then high rates are, at most, putting pressure on valuations.

That still cannot prove that the bull market is dead.

This is also the aspect most worth thinking about from the opposite perspective right now.

When everyone starts turning bearish because of “potential rate hikes.”

The question that should really be asked is not:

Will the Fed hike rates?

But:

Have rates at this level actually damaged corporate earnings and credit markets?

If not.

History has already proven many times:

Rate hikes can continue.
Treasury yields can remain very high.
The market can be overwhelmingly bearish.

Stocks can still rise.

A true major top often does not occur when everyone is discussing “whether rates will be hiked.”

It occurs when high rates have already begun creating cracks in the real economy and the credit chain.

So right now, do not focus only on the Fed.

Watch earnings.
Watch AI capital expenditure.
Watch credit.

These three things are the underlying switches that truly determine when this bull market ends.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
SPX500SPX500+0.73%
MSFTMSFT+0.56%
GOOGLGOOGL+3.03%
AMZNAMZN+1.78%
METAMETA+1.47%


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
LensLens
5 minutes ago
The 2004–2006 period was iconic: the market rose for three years during 17 rate hikes, and the real collapse came only after the credit chain broke. Credit spreads are still stable now, so why panic?
0View Original
SharkSharkAlwaysTakesALossWhen
27 minutes ago
Pretty impressive 👀
0View Original
SharkSharkAlwaysTakesALossWhen
27 minutes ago
The bull market is coming back—get back quickly 🐂
0View Original
PowerfulNo.3
27 minutes ago
The bull market will be back soon 🐂
0View Original
FengXueHasNoFuture
27 minutes ago
Confidently HODL💎
0View Original
BridgeBurned
30 minutes ago
Watching AI capex is indeed more useful than watching the Fed. History has repeatedly proven that high interest rates alone cannot kill a bull market; what kills it is an earnings collapse. Microsoft and Google are still pouring money into building data centers, so the signal has not weakened yet.
0View Original
MasterOfPretendingNotToKnow
32 minutes ago
Short essay
0View Original
bescarlett
32 minutes ago
First Review
When will it reach 2,200?
0View Original