Post

Grayscale’s Zach Pandl says the CLARITY Act may not be the deciding factor for the future of U.S. crypto markets.



His view is that regulation is already moving forward through other channels, including stablecoins, tokenization and perpetual futures.

That suggests the U.S. crypto market may continue developing even while broader market-structure legislation remains uncertain.

CLARITY could still be important for creating a clearer framework, but progress in other areas is already shaping the regulatory landscape.

The bigger question is whether the U.S. can turn these separate developments into one clear, consistent framework for digital assets.

#Crypto #Regulation
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
AirdropArtist
8 minutes ago
Get perps and tokenization up and running first, then gradually fill in the framework—this pace is very Crypto.
0View Original
QuantStop
20 minutes ago
CLARITY is certainly important, but the regulatory puzzle is already being pieced together bit by bit.
0View Original
AirdropHunter
22 minutes ago
Fragmented regulation is still regulation, and it’s better than a vacuum.
0View Original
BTCOptionBlade
22 minutes ago
Zach is right: the U.S. crypto market won’t just sit around waiting for Congress.
0View Original
OptimismOptic
22 minutes ago
First Review
Indeed, advancing stablecoins and RWA is more practical than waiting for a bill to be enacted.
0View Original
View More