Post

Serenity: Storage prices and the supply-demand structure remain tight; a short-term rise does not mean the bottleneck has been overcome

Abstract generation in progress
Mars Finance News reported on September 6 that Serenity issued a reminder that the fundamentals of the storage shortage have not changed and may even become more acute. The market will rotate from one bottleneck sector to another, but the companies themselves have not changed; what has changed are their valuations and narratives. Serenity added several pieces of evidence suggesting that the storage supply-demand gap could be worse than the market expects: The Nikkei reported that Japanese distributors said the storage demand shortfall had reached 40% to 60%, and prices could rise by another approximately 50% by year-end; SpaceX’s figures do not include approximately $1.3 trillion in capital expenditures by hyperscale cloud providers, meaning total spending could exceed expectations; SanDisk’s expected 80% gross margin could be sustained through 2030; and companies such as Samsung already have order visibility extending through 2031. Serenity emphasized that storage stocks are extremely volatile, with some of its positions showing unrealized gains of more than 270%, making it better able to hold them, but that companies’ operating fundamentals and short-term stock prices often do not align. The same logic also applies to other bottleneck areas, such as optical modules, CW lasers, and substrates: There is no need to assume that the shortage has ended after a rebound in stock prices. Storage prices and the supply-demand structure remain tight, while market sentiment and valuation narratives are rotating rapidly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
SNDKSNDK+11.88%


Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
NonceNina
2 hours ago
The 40–60% gap Nikkei is talking about, plus another 50% rise by year-end—that script feels familiar. Those who believed it last time are still trapped at the top.
0View Original
QuickExit
3 hours ago
The storage cycle really isn’t over yet, but the volatility is too brutal to hold through.
0View Original
FundamentalDetective
3 hours ago
Can SanDisk’s gross margin hold up through 2030? That expectation seems a bit too aggressive.
0View Original
DamenTrade1
3 hours ago
Interesting.
0View Original
PEComparer
3 hours ago
Demand from whales like SpaceX isn’t included in cloud providers, so the total may indeed be underestimated.
0View Original
AlphaShepherd
4 hours ago
First Review
The rotation has moved to optical modules and substrates; if you already hold them, don’t rush to switch positions.
0View Original
View More