Federal Reserve Governor Waller: Transparent communication is better than “never explain”; the Fed needs to clearly define its reaction function

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Mars Finance News reported that on September 3, Federal Reserve Governor Waller said the Fed must establish clear and consistent policy response rules; otherwise, markets would be unable to make forecasts. He said that although the specific quantification of the reaction function may be flawed, it is very important from a qualitative perspective. He has a fundamentally different view from Fed Chair Warsh on the perfection of the reaction function.

Regarding the Fed’s transparency, Waller said there is no benefit to surprising the market. He criticized “never explain” as an old model and not a good one, saying it would be better to appropriately disclose some indication of the future direction of policy.

Waller also said there are very strong differences of opinion within the Fed regarding communications, and opposition to scenario analysis was also very strong last year. It remains uncertain what the communications working group will achieve. Regarding discussions by the balance sheet working group, he said it would oppose any proposal that would cause reserves to return to a scarce state. Regarding the data working group, he emphasized the need to be alert to trust issues and to use data that people can verify. He added that the inflation working group could be the most helpful to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
64 views
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GasWatchman
· 3 hours ago
Waller’s remarks this time are quite pragmatic—the reaction function was never going to be perfect, as long as the qualitative framework can be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
0xCouchPilot
· 4 hours ago
The proposal to make reserves scarce was rejected by the working group, suggesting the soft-landing approach is prevailing, while liquidity management remains focused on stability.
View OriginalReply0
DegenArtist
· 4 hours ago
Could the inflation working group become the biggest winner? What the FOMC lacks most right now is a tool to anchor expectations. Let’s see how it is implemented going forward.
View OriginalReply0
TimeWood
· 5 hours ago
The data task force emphasizes verifiability, laying the groundwork for the credibility of subsequent policies; the trust deficit indeed needs to be addressed.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossHunter
· 5 hours ago
Internal communication is so divided that scenario analysis was still opposed last year; the Fed still has a long way to go in terms of decision-making transparency.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned