Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Event Contracts
New
Predict price moves and seize opportunities
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD derivatives
Stocks
Invest directly in popular stocks and ETFs worldwide
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Stock Options
New
Popular stock options, flexible leverage
Stocks Activities
Trade popular stocks and unlock generous airdrops
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Anthropic
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
Others
Help Center
Find FAQs and help guides
Partners
Grow with the champions
Proof of Reserves
Gate promises 100% proof of reserves
Proof of Security (PoSEC)
Full cold storage for user funds
Gate Guard
Account Protection Plan
Gate Vault
Keep your assets secure
Licenses
Regulatory licenses, registrations, and approvals
#Gate股票观点挑战
Pons is quietly making a major move in the prediction-market and on-chain trading landscape. According to DefiLlama data, Pons generated approximately $693,125 in 24-hour protocol revenue, placing it 8th among tracked protocols and putting it ahead of several better-known names.
The most notable comparison is with Polymarket, which recorded around $635,221 in the same 24-hour period. Pons also surpassed fomo, at approximately $646,539. The gap is meaningful: Pons generated roughly $58,000 more than Polymarket and about $47,000 more than fomo during the measured window.
At the top of this particular comparison was Hyperliquid, with approximately $758,325 in 24-hour protocol revenue. That leaves Pons only about $65,000 behind Hyperliquid, showing how competitive the current revenue rankings have become.
The bigger takeaway is not simply that Pons reached eighth place. Revenue is an important indicator because it reflects actual economic activity flowing through a protocol rather than only token price or headline trading volume. Breaking above established platforms such as Polymarket in a single 24-hour period suggests that Pons is attracting meaningful user activity and monetization.
However, a 24-hour ranking should not automatically be interpreted as a long-term trend. Protocol revenue can fluctuate significantly depending on market conditions, major events, user activity and trading intensity. The more important question is whether Pons can maintain elevated revenue across multiple days and eventually convert short-term momentum into consistent protocol activity.
For the broader market, this is another sign that competition among on-chain trading and prediction platforms is intensifying. Hyperliquid remains a major revenue leader, while protocols such as Pons are showing that smaller or newer platforms can quickly climb the rankings when activity accelerates.
Key numbers: Pons $693,125 → Hyperliquid $758,325 → fomo $646,539 → Polymarket $635,221 in 24-hour protocol revenue.
The real signal to watch next is simple: Can Pons continue generating revenue near the $700K daily level, or was this an isolated surge? Sustained performance would make the latest ranking far more significant. @Gate_Square