Today is my 699th day of posting updates. If you think I’m a serious person, you’re welcome to join me, and I also hope my daily content can help you. The world is vast, while I am small. Follow me so you won’t have trouble finding me.

Why is buying “the next one” often more likely to lose money after missing the market leader?
The most common trap in crypto isn’t failing to catch a 10x coin, but rushing to find a substitute after missing it.
After BTC rises, people look for “the next BTC”; after SOL takes off, they look for “the next SOL.” When a Meme coin explodes, they rush into the one in the same sector with the most similar name and the smallest gain. The reasoning sounds solid: the leader is too expensive, while the laggard has more room to catch up.

I used to make these trades too. When I saw that the leader had already doubled and was afraid to chase it, I would buy a second-tier project that “hadn’t started moving yet.” The result? When the leader pulled back 10%, it fell 30%; when the leader continued rising, it still didn’t move. Only later did I understand that not rising doesn’t necessarily mean being undervalued—it may also mean that the market simply doesn’t believe in it.

A leader becomes a leader through the combined effects of liquidity, narrative, trading volume, and token distribution. Followers may have a similar story, but they do not have the same capital support. A genuine catch-up move needs evidence: sustained growth in trading volume, strengthening relative strength, and spot capital flowing in—not merely the fact that “it hasn’t risen yet.”

Missing a market rally is not frightening. What is frightening is handing your money to a shadow that the market has never validated just to make up for the feeling of missing out. Remember: not having risen doesn’t mean being cheap. “The next leader” is, more often than not, just a story told to you while someone else is unloading.