SEC Proposes Regulation Crypto Assets for Fundraising



The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has formally proposed "Regulation Crypto Assets," a landmark rulemaking that would create two exemptions from securities registration requirements for crypto projects . The proposal includes a conditional safe-harbor provision that could free digital assets from investment-contract restrictions once the issuer completes or permanently ceases its core managerial efforts . However, the SEC reportedly delayed a planned innovation exemption for tokenized securities to avoid complicating political negotiations around the CLARITY Act, with industry leaders warning legal challenges could delay implementation by as much as two years .
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
63 views
  • Reward
  • 4
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
TectonicShift
· 1h ago
Put bluntly, the SEC has finally acknowledged that the old framework is unsuitable for crypto, but the sugar comes wrapped in thorns. The safe harbor is not the end point, but a repackaged control clause; with the innovation exemption delayed, politics unresolved, and legal battles dragging on, everyone still has to run naked. For a policy like this, don’t focus on the positives yet—wait for the detailed rules.
Reply0
SlippageWarning
· 1h ago
This rule is like making empty promises; we’ll talk once it can actually be implemented, especially with the safe harbor conditions in place.
Reply0
LeverageLimiter
· 2h ago
The sleight of hand in this proposal is actually quite clever: nominally, it opens two exemption paths for crypto assets, but in practice, it uses the safe harbor to bind project teams to continuously perform core management functions; the approach of truly wanting to quickly create tokenized securities is blocked, clearly putting politics first. If the legal challenge drags on for another two years, the industry will miss another cycle, and only big players can afford to wait.
Reply0
FlashLoanCritic
· 2h ago
A two-year delay? By then, the market will have gone through several cycles. The SEC is using the rules as bargaining chips again. Project teams might as well prioritize compliance—by the time the legal battle is over, the opportunity will be gone.
Reply0
  • Pinned