One Position, Three Potential Reward Streams



Most DeFi strategies make you choose.

Do you stake your assets for rewards, or provide liquidity and earn from trading fees?

The new hGRAM/GRAM pool on STONfi takes a different approach.

With the setup, the same position can potentially benefit from three sources:

→ Hipo staking rewards from holding hGRAM
→ Trading fees generated by swaps through the pool
→ Boosted HPO rewards on top

That’s what makes this pool interesting.

Instead of treating staking and liquidity provision as completely separate strategies, it combines them into one position.

Of course, more reward streams don’t mean zero risk.

Impermanent loss, token price movements, pool conditions and changing incentives still matter. So the potential rewards should always be evaluated alongside the risks.

But for anyone already holding hGRAM, this is definitely an opportunity worth understanding.

Three potential reward streams. One liquidity position.

That’s an interesting DeFi design.

DYOR before providing liquidity.
GRAM2.92%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
50 views
  • Reward
  • 5
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
CapitalDefender
· 3h ago
Got it—while holding hGRAM, you also earn fees and HPO incentives, basically getting three benefits from one position. But the DYOR part is all too true: pools lately aren’t something you can just enter casually; you need to keep an eye on APY changes and TVL trends.
View OriginalReply0
BlobTrader
· 3h ago
Honestly, I happen to have some hGRAM on hand. I’d been debating whether to stake it or add liquidity, so this certainly makes things easier. But I still need to check the pool depth and trading volume on STONfi first—don’t just rely on the hype.
View OriginalReply0
RevokeRanger
· 3h ago
Essentially, it complicates the liquidity providers’ yield structure, and the correlations among the three sources also need to be considered. If price volatility and reward decay occur simultaneously, it may end up being less stable than simply staking.
View OriginalReply0
CloseOutSniper
· 3h ago
This design is pretty interesting—bundling staking and market making together means one principal does three jobs. But if the incentives are reduced someday, the returns may not look so attractive.
View OriginalReply0
VolHunter
· 3h ago
Three types of returns from a single position sounds pretty appealing, but impermanent loss can’t be ignored—you need to run the numbers carefully before entering.
View OriginalReply0