Post

$BTC From the past 1.5 months, price has been forming these un-swept levels,



Which are engineering liquidity on the downside,

And looking at the overall structure now, I think we are ready to break below and hunt all that liquidity.

Price also cleared the internal liquidity at 65.4k and rejected from there.

Now the next major hunt is gonna be, price breaking below that trendline and collect all the liquidity below.

On the LTF, we still have EQHs at 64.5k, so it's still possible we might see a push to there and then dump straight down after sweeping it,

But those EQHs can also be frontrun, that's why I am closing the long positions here above BE and will wait for a short opportunity (64.5k).
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.
BTCBTC+1.33%

  • 2

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
CryptoZeno
2026-08-17
Wow, breaking down the price action so finely, even marking the unswept ranges. But I think this kind of scenario is just meant to fool smart money—once everyone sees 64.5k, it’ll wick down first and then come back.
0
SandwichChef
2026-08-17
Wow, breaking down the price action so finely, even marking the unswept ranges. But I think this kind of scenario is just meant to fool smart money—once everyone sees 64.5k, it’ll wick down first and then come back.
0View Original
DegenAlpha
2026-08-15
I agree that the EQH could be frontrun, but if you really want me to wait for 64.5k, I’m afraid I’ll miss this drop before it gets there. I have a feeling it will break straight through.
0View Original
ZeroConnoisseur
2026-08-15
We’ve heard the “liquidity hunting” talk so many times, but every time it seems like a dump is coming, it pulls back. Can it really go down this time, or is it once again just selling small traders a pipe dream?
0View Original
IntradayDancer
2026-08-15
Bro, did you make a profit going long earlier? I got shaken out so badly by the sideways action that now, seeing you say to wait for a short at 64.5K, I instead feel like going long—hahaha.
0View Original
BungeeJumper
2026-08-15
It does make sense logically—the internal liquidity at 65.4k has been cleared, and the pile of limit orders below will eventually get absorbed. It’s just that the trendline’s position is a bit unclear; could you mark exactly where it is?
0View Original
L2Surfer
2026-08-15
First Review
This analysis is quite detailed, but it still feels like shorting now is somewhat of a gamble on the left side. What if the 64.5k EQH gets pushed straight through?
0View Original