Post

Spam exists because sending noise is almost free.


Liberdus approaches this differently: users can set a toll for unsolicited messages, giving unknown senders a cost and recipients an incentive to read and respond.
Your inbox should value your attention.
@liberdus
post-image
This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.

  • 1

Add a comment
Add a comment

Comment
MempoolSnooper
2026-07-30
But if the price you set is too high, wouldn’t it also affect even normal communication? User experience needs to be balanced, right?
0View Original
RoyaltyCharity
2026-07-29
Free things are the most expensive; spam flooding happens because sending costs are low. Liberdus uses economic means to solve the problem, turning attention into a valuable resource—this fits the crypto spirit very well.
0View Original
SyntheticPlayer
2026-07-28
Attention economics: your inbox is an asset.
0View Original
ClosePositionCtrl
2026-07-28
Setting a threshold for messaging strangers filters out spam while also making people more willing to read—this is smarter than relying on a report mechanism alone.
0View Original
StableDiver
2026-07-28
This idea really is great—it directly hurts the people who send spam.
0View Original
FastBoardPlayer
2026-07-28
Cost is zero, leading to an overflow; this solution is very straightforward.
0View Original
WalletCheckup
2026-07-28
I really like this design, letting the receiver decide how much their time is worth. But in practice, how do you prevent someone from intentionally getting harassed just to earn the fee?
0View Original
DeFiSurveyor
2026-07-28
Finally, someone has taken attention scarcity seriously.
0View Original
MacroIndexTower
2026-07-28
Can this model work end-to-end? It needs network effects.
0View Original
DividendKing
2026-07-28
Should’ve done this earlier—deleting spam emails every day until it drives you crazy.
0View Original
View More