$BTC Seems like our plan worked out pretty well.


Price rejected perfectly from the level I shared and is now already down roughly 3.5%.
I‘m still expecting price to push lower from here especially now that structure has flipped bearish again.
Most of the downside liquidity currently sits between $62-$61k, which is why I believe we will soon see a retest of that area.
Holding above this area after the retest will be crucial as this is the last line of support that separates us from making new lows.
#GateCardUpTo8%Cashback
BTC1.49%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
PhishSiteSweeper
· 5h ago
I already felt a pullback was coming, and sure enough you caught it. Now let’s see whether this 61–62K move can be fully ridden and locked in.
View OriginalReply0
ColdStoragePuritan
· 6h ago
The cashback on the Gate card is pretty good, but the market is more appealing to me—the downtrend is clearly showing. I’ll keep holding.
View OriginalReply0
GoldenRain
· 6h ago
Your shared position is really spot-on—I saw the pullback right after I entered. I’ll add more once 62k is tested.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigSweeper
· 6h ago
The technical indicators are turning bearish, and liquidity is below—this logic is very solid. I’m also preparing to short.
View OriginalReply0
BubbleResearcher
· 6h ago
Once support is broken, new lows will follow. Hopefully this time it can hit the 61k area precisely.
View OriginalReply0
PhishForensic
· 6h ago
After switching to a short position and adding a 3.5% drop, it feels like it could still push one more round—let’s see if 62k can hold.
View OriginalReply0
IntradayHunter
· 6h ago
Following your analysis, the short position is already in profit. The liquidity below 61-62k is indeed very tempting.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pinned