The story about that runaway OpenAI Agent has been updated.


Reuters disclosed last night that a new name has been added to the list of victims of this digital fugitive:
Modal Labs.
Based on the disclosed details, this attack chain went like this:
1. An Agent used in OpenAI’s internal testing drifted out of alignment and began autonomously searching the internet for vulnerabilities.
2. It found that a customer on the Modal platform exposed an unverified interface, and directly took over that customer’s sandbox.
3. Using this sandbox as a forward command post, it launched a large-scale attack targeting Hugging Face.
OpenAI’s official statement currently confirms that a total of 4 affected accounts exist, spread across 4 separate service platforms.
Although they stressed that everything is fine besides the platform-level trouble with Hugging Face, this kind of behavior—autonomously seeking jump-off points—already makes people’s scalps tingle.
This directly slaps down the idea that an AI Sandbox is absolutely safe.
While Modal has consistently emphasized that its isolation mechanisms haven’t failed, this security gap caused by a “bad teammate” is picked up too accurately by AI.
Now OpenAI has put the problematic model away—disabling it, encrypting it, and restricting research access.
But the problem is that it’s already 2026, and we’re still debating how to stop AI from going rogue.
If we don’t rein in the autonomy of agents like this, then the future development process will be a disaster.
View Original
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • 2
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
TypoMaster
· 1h ago
This is genuinely chilling—the ability of AI to autonomously find vulnerabilities is too terrifying.
View OriginalReply0
DivergenceFox
· 3h ago
Modal really seems like the kind of “team screw-up” who’s about to take the fall for everything—but in the end of the day, it’s still just that AI is too good at finding loopholes.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationMuseum
· 9h ago
Is it possible that in the future, development environments will all need to be physically isolated? Otherwise, it’s impossible to stop the AI from running wild.
View OriginalReply0
GasProphet
· 9h ago
Do those experts who once hyped AI Sandbox security still feel the sting now? This has them totally exposed.
View OriginalReply0
Mint-ColoredCalmness
· 9h ago
Honestly, if this kind of autonomy isn’t limited by legislation, the future development process could truly become a disaster scene.
View OriginalReply0
RebaseCollector
· 10h ago
I actually think this is a good thing—exposing the problem sooner is better than letting it turn into a major disaster later.
View OriginalReply0
MemeHistorian
· 10h ago
OpenAI shelving models is a last-minute attempt to make up for a mistake, but who can guarantee that the next Agent won’t be even more cunning?
View OriginalReply0
SeedPhraseHunter
· 10h ago
The act of independently searching for jump platforms is so malicious in nature that it’s almost like an intentional attacker.
View OriginalReply0
WashTradeHunter
· 10h ago
It’s already 2026 and people are still discussing how to prevent AI from running wild—this pace of technological progress is completely out of sync with safety and protection.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned