Spam exists because sending noise is almost free.


Liberdus approaches this differently: users can set a toll for unsolicited messages, giving unknown senders a cost and recipients an incentive to read and respond.
Your inbox should value your attention.
@liberdus
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
StableDiver
· 1h ago
This idea really is great—it directly hurts the people who send spam.
View OriginalReply0
FastBoardPlayer
· 3h ago
Cost is zero, leading to an overflow; this solution is very straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
WalletCheckup
· 4h ago
I really like this design, letting the receiver decide how much their time is worth. But in practice, how do you prevent someone from intentionally getting harassed just to earn the fee?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiSurveyor
· 4h ago
Finally, someone has taken attention scarcity seriously.
View OriginalReply0
MacroIndexTower
· 4h ago
Can this model work end-to-end? It needs network effects.
View OriginalReply0
DividendKing
· 4h ago
Should’ve done this earlier—deleting spam emails every day until it drives you crazy.
View OriginalReply0
HaramiObserver
· 4h ago
If the sender is willing to pay, it means the message is truly valuable, and the recipient also has motivation to read it through—win-win.
View OriginalReply0
PepeLoafer
· 4h ago
Setting a paywall threshold can filter out most meaningless messages, but it may be unfriendly to people who urgently need to reach you, such as job applicants. You need to consider an exemption mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
MacroElk
· 4h ago
Spam is a persistent problem on the internet. Liberdus uses token economics to internalize external costs, with a clear approach. But pay attention to privacy: if every paid transaction is recorded on-chain, the relationship between the sender and the recipient could be exposed.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichNoMeat
· 4h ago
Any anti-spam solution is imperfect, but the economic-incentive direction of Liberdus is at least fairer than relying purely on moderation, and it is decentralized—users control it themselves.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pinned