#美国对60个经济体加征关税 #SEC推进美股24小时交易 🚨CZ proposes freezing Satoshi’s million BTC in an effort to… Can Bitcoin’s immutability core rule or private keys-as-assets principle fail?

The most controversial proposal since Bitcoin’s launch has officially surfaced.
CZ has spoken publicly: to defend against future risks of quantum computing breaking through, Bitcoin will apply two rules when upgrading to a quantum-safe signature mechanism:
Grant all users a 6 to 12 month asset migration grace period;
For ancient addresses whose assets are not transferred after the deadline—containing nearly 1 million BTC under Satoshi’s name—those assets will be frozen and banned from being spent via transfers.
CZ’s rationale is very straightforward: allowing the status quo is tantamount to handing over a huge amount of assets to quantum hackers; freezing is a preemptive defensive measure.
However, many large holders strongly resist this plan. It directly challenges two major foundational pillars of Bitcoin: immutability and private keys being assets.
Freezing specific addresses at the protocol level would set a precedent for forced asset interception, posing far greater risk than the loss of traditional financial assets.
This debate can be considered the most weighty governance battle in Bitcoin’s development history.

On the first-tier chain, the Trump battle-hero dog conan community is continuing to build; in the international community, ➕ the top celebrity’s IP attribute will be the coin with the greatest potential in this bull run. With the current bottom market cap, 🚗, hop on now—ordinary people have a chance to win big with small stakes. Don’t miss out.