《On-Chain Options Segment Reboots: From Complex Tools to Real Demand》(Author Castle Labs; compiled by Deep Tide TechFlow) On-chain options have repeatedly failed due to insufficient liquidity, low capital efficiency, difficulties in pricing, and complex user experience. Early protocols such as Opyn, Hegic, Ribbon, and Lyra were unable to establish a sustainable market. However, as Rollups reduce costs, CLOB and RFQ improve the market-making environment, institutional demand for crypto options rises, and prediction market education helps users accept nonlinear payouts, on-chain options have begun to recover. Currently, protocols such as Derive, Rysk, and Aevo are exploring paths that include professional exchanges, yield-bearing options, and all-in-one derivatives platforms. The key to the sector still lies in whether it can find real use cases that cannot be replaced by contracts and prediction markets. Read more:

AEVO-1.08%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned