This time, I came to Hangzhou and made contact with various offline communities.


To be honest, a lot of these leaders are pretty pitiful— they don’t even have $1,000 to $2,000 in coins, and they say they need to wait a few days until money comes out of some project before they can buy.
I told them about some open-source projects—sato, slowfish—and I said it’s a trend. They got scared once they heard that the project team might issue more tokens, pull the liquidity, and run away.
Ridiculous. Tragic.
Then they’re playing around with Ponzi schemes themselves. I told them, “Fine—if you invest in an xx project, it’s still centralized.” They said, “Boss has the ability!” They said they’ll take me to Southeast Asia and keep doing hosting and treating, going to private rooms and partying. The project is very capable.
What I wanted to say, but didn’t:
What these “capable” projects call ability is just using your own principal money to show off. They throw out some rice to see how many chickens come. When no new chickens show up, they still catch the chickens that are pecking at the rice and slaughter them. The rice in hand is also pocketed.
The more they show off and the more “capable” the project is, the more vicious it is when they cut—it costs a lot, so the money they spend is all users’ principal.
People with low awareness can’t hold onto real, sincere projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned